Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25637852›Full record

ArticleBrain research2015

Captured by the pain: pain steady-state evoked potentials are not modulated by selective spatial attention.

Maria Blöchl, Marcel Franz, Wolfgang H R Miltner, Thomas Weiss

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria BlöchlDepartment of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Am Steiger 3/Haus 1, D-07743 Jena, Germany.
Marcel FranzDepartment of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Am Steiger 3/Haus 1, D-07743 Jena, Germany.
Wolfgang H R MiltnerDepartment of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Am Steiger 3/Haus 1, D-07743 Jena, Germany.
Thomas WeissDepartment of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Am Steiger 3/Haus 1, D-07743 Jena, Germany. Electronic address: thomas.weiss@uni-jena.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention has been shown to affect the neural processing of pain. However, the exact mechanisms underlying this modulation remain unknown. Here, we used a new method called pain steady-state evoked potentials (PSSEPs) to investigate whether selective spatial attention affects EEG responses to tonic painful stimuli. In general, steady-state evoked potentials reflect changes in the EEG spectrum at a certain frequency that correspond to the frequency of a train of applied stimuli. In this study, high intensity transcutaneous electrical stimulation was delivered to both hands simultaneously with 31 Hz and 37 Hz, respectively. Subject׳s attention was directed to one of the two trains of stimulation in order to detect a small gap that was occasionally interspersed into the stimulus trains. Thereby, they had to ignore the stimulation applied to the other hand. Results show that PSSEPs were induced at 31 Hz and 37 Hz at frontal and central electrodes. PSSEPs occurred contralaterally to the respective hand stimulated with that frequency. Surprisingly, the magnitude of PSSEPs was not modulated by spatial attention towards one of the two stimuli. Our results indicate that attention can hardly be shifted between two simultaneously applied tonic painful stimulations.

Indexed as

AttentionBrainElectric StimulationElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHandHumansMalePainYoung AdultAttentionHumanPainPain steady-state evoked potentials

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.