Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25637745›Full record

ArticleHearing research2015

Deletion of Shank1 has minimal effects on the molecular composition and function of glutamatergic afferent postsynapses in the mouse inner ear.

Jeremy P Braude, Sarath Vijayakumar, Katherine Baumgarner, Rebecca Laurine, Timothy A Jones, Sherri M Jones, Sonja J Pyott

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SHANK2 establishes auditory hair bundle architecture essential for mammalian hearing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy P BraudeUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington, Department of Biology and Marine Biology, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, NC 28403, USA.
Sarath VijayakumarUniversity of Nebraska Lincoln, Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, 304B Barkley Memorial Center, Lincoln, NE 68583-0738, USA.
Katherine BaumgarnerUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington, Department of Biology and Marine Biology, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, NC 28403, USA.
Rebecca LaurineUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington, Department of Biology and Marine Biology, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, NC 28403, USA.
Timothy A JonesUniversity of Nebraska Lincoln, Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, 304B Barkley Memorial Center, Lincoln, NE 68583-0738, USA.
Sherri M JonesUniversity of Nebraska Lincoln, Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, 304B Barkley Memorial Center, Lincoln, NE 68583-0738, USA.
Sonja J PyottUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington, Department of Biology and Marine Biology, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, NC 28403, USA. Electronic address: s.pyott@umcg.nl.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington · US

Funding

Ontogeny of spatial coding in the mouse utricleR01DC005776 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI JONES, TIMOTHY ARTHUR · 2003 to 2005
$1.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shank proteins (1-3) are considered the master organizers of glutamatergic postsynaptic densities in the central nervous system, and the genetic deletion of either Shank1, 2, or 3 results in altered composition, form, and strength of glutamatergic postsynapses. To investigate the contribution of Shank proteins to glutamatergic afferent synapses of the inner ear and especially cochlea, we used immunofluorescence and quantitative real time PCR to determine the expression of Shank1, 2, and 3 in the cochlea. Because we found evidence for expression of Shank1 but not 2 and 3, we investigated the morphology, composition, and function of afferent postsynaptic densities from defined tonotopic regions in the cochlea of Shank1(-/-) mice. Using immunofluorescence, we identified subtle changes in the morphology and composition (but not number and localization) of cochlear afferent postsynaptic densities at the lower frequency region (8 kHz) in Shank1(-/-) mice compared to Shank1(+/+) littermates. However, we detected no differences in auditory brainstem responses at matching or higher frequencies. We also identified Shank1 in the vestibular afferent postsynaptic densities, but detected no differences in vestibular sensory evoked potentials in Shank1(-/-) mice compared to Shank1(+/+) littermates. This work suggests that Shank proteins play a different role in the development and maintenance of glutamatergic afferent synapses in the inner ear compared to the central nervous system.

Indexed as

Synaptic TransmissionAnimalsAuditory PathwaysCochleaEar, InnerEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemGenotypeGlutamic AcidHair Cells, Auditory, InnerMice, 129 StrainMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMicrofilament ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsPhenotypeTime FactorsGlutamic AcidMicrofilament ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsSHANK1 protein, mouseShank2 protein, mouseShank3 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID25637745
PMCPMC4485438
OpenAlexW2103332580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.