Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25637439›Full record

ArticleAdvances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.)2015

GABAergic control of depression-related brain states.

Bernhard Luscher, Thomas Fuchs

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. High-dose Vitamin-B6 reduces sensory over-responsivity.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. SAGE-217, A Novel GABAClinical pharmacokinetics · 2020
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. TheFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bernhard LuscherDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for Molecular Investigation of Neurological Disorders, The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: bxl25@psu.edu.
Thomas FuchsDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for Molecular Investigation of Neurological Disorders, The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

GABAergic Control of Depression Related Brain StatesR01MH099851 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI LUSCHER, BERNHARD · 2013 to 2019
$3.2M
GABAergic Synapse Assembly: Extrasynaptic GABAAR TargetingR01MH083911 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI CHEN, GONG · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
Use of a mouse model of anxious depression to assess the safety of pediatric antiRC1MH089111 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI LUSCHER, BERNHARD · 2009 to 2010
$828k
A novel developmental mouse model of major depressive disorderR21MH097247 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI LUSCHER, BERNHARD · 2012 to 2013
$402k
NIMH NIH HHS MH083911NIMH NIH HHS MH097247NIMH NIH HHS MH099851NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083911NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099851NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH097247NIMH NIH HHS RC1 MH089111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The GABAergic deficit hypothesis of major depressive disorders (MDDs) posits that reduced γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentration in brain, impaired function of GABAergic interneurons, altered expression and function of GABA(A) receptors, and changes in GABAergic transmission dictated by altered chloride homeostasis can contribute to the etiology of MDD. Conversely, the hypothesis posits that the efficacy of currently used antidepressants is determined by their ability to enhance GABAergic neurotransmission. We here provide an update for corresponding evidence from studies of patients and preclinical animal models of depression. In addition, we propose an explanation for the continued lack of genetic evidence that explains the considerable heritability of MDD. Lastly, we discuss how alterations in GABAergic transmission are integral to other hypotheses of MDD that emphasize (i) the role of monoaminergic deficits, (ii) stress-based etiologies, (iii) neurotrophic deficits, and (iv) the neurotoxic and neural circuit-impairing consequences of chronic excesses of glutamate. We propose that altered GABAergic transmission serves as a common denominator of MDD that can account for all these other hypotheses and that plays a causal and common role in diverse mechanistic etiologies of depressive brain states and in the mechanism of action of current antidepressant drug therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntidepressive AgentsBrainDisease Models, Animalgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansMajor Depressive DisorderReceptors, GABA-ASynaptic TransmissionAntidepressive Agentsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidReceptors, GABA-AAntidepressant drug actionAnxietyBDNFExcitatory–inhibitory balanceGABAHippocampal neurogenesisMajor depressive disorder

Identifiers

PMID25637439
PMCPMC4784429
OpenAlexW135939678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.