ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2015
Using Smartphone Apps to Promote Psychiatric and Physical Well-Being.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Digital health behaviour change interventions in severe mental illness: a systematic review.Psychological medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Usability Evaluations of Mobile Mental Health Technologies: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- User Engagement in Mental Health Apps: A Review of Measurement, Reporting, and Validity.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Mobile Phone Ownership and Endorsement of "mHealth" Among People With Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2016Pooled it
- Associations Between Genetic Risk, Physical Activities, and Distressing Psychotic-like Experiences.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Article
- Smartphone Apps and Digital Tools for Managing Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders: A Clinical Review.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2025Review
- The role of public and patient involvement in designing a web-based, physical activity application for individuals with severe mental illness.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Framework for understanding movement and physical activity in patients diagnosed with psychosis.BMJ mental health · 2024Article
- m-RESIST, a Mobile Therapeutic Intervention for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Use of new technologies for the promotion of physical activity in patients with mental illness: A systematic review.World journal of psychiatry · 2023Article
- Minding metabolism: targeted interventions to improve cardio-metabolic monitoring across early and chronic psychosis.Irish journal of medical science · 2022Article
- Emerging Needs and Viability of Telepsychiatry During and Post COVID-19 Era: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2021Review
- ReMindCare, an app for daily clinical practice in patients with first episode psychosis: A pragmatic real-world study protocol.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2021Article
- The Acceptability and Feasibility of Using Text Messaging to Support the Delivery of Physical Health Care in those Suffering from a Psychotic Disorder: a Review of the Literature.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2020Review
- Digital Peer Support Mental Health Interventions for People With a Lived Experience of a Serious Mental Illness: Systematic Review.JMIR mental health · 2020Article
- Development of the Motivation and Skills Support (MASS) social goal attainment smartphone app for (and with) people with schizophrenia.Journal of behavioral and cognitive therapy · 2020Article
- A new hope for early psychosis care: the evolving landscape of digital care tools.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2019Article
- The technology specialist: a 21st century support role in clinical care.NPJ digital medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This pilot study tested the acceptability and usability of a prototype app designed to promote the physical well-being of adults with psychiatric disorders. The application under evaluation, WellWave, promoted walking as a physical exercise, and offered a variety of supportive non-physical activities, including confidential text-messaging with peer staff, and a digital library of readings and videos on recovery from psychiatric illness. Study participants engaged strongly in the app throughout the 4-week study, showing a 94 % mean daily usage rate, and a 73 % mean response rate across all electronic messages and prompts, which approximates the gold standard of 75 % for momentary ecological assessment studies. Seven of the ten study participants averaged two or more walks per week, beginning with 5-min walks and ending with walks lasting 20 min or longer. This responsiveness to the walking prompts, and the overall high rate of engagement in other app features, suggest that adults with psychiatric conditions would welcome and benefit from similar smartphone interventions that promote healthy behaviours in life domains other than exercise. Pilot study results also suggest that smartphone applications can be useful as research tools in the development and testing of theories and practical strategies for encouraging healthy lifestyles. Participants were prompted periodically to rate their own health quality, perceived control over their health, and stage-of-change in adopting a walking routine, and these electronic self-ratings showed acceptable concurrent and discriminant validity, with all participants reporting moderate to high motivation to exercise by the end of the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25636496What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.