ArticleBMC public health2015
Acceptability of financial incentives and penalties for encouraging uptake of healthy behaviours: focus groups.
Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Financial incentives for a healthy life style and disease prevention among older people: a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A Person-Based Web-Based Sleep Intervention Aimed at Adolescents (SleepWise): Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Trial
- Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake.BMC public health · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Professionals' Perceptions on Implementing an Adapted Lifestyle Coaching Program for People with Physical Disabilities.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring views of members of the public and policymakers on the acceptability of population level dietary and active-travel policies: a qualitative study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023Article
- Experiences of conditional and unconditional cash transfers intended for improving health outcomes and health service use: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Gambling, fast food and alcohol sponsorship in elite sport - perspectives from Australian sporting fans.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Improving WHO's understanding of WHO guideline uptake and use in Member States: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- How and why do financial incentives contribute to helping people stop smoking? A realist review protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Using financial incentives to support service engagement of adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness: A qualitative analysis of key stakeholder perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- The Impact of Financial Incentives on Service Engagement Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness and Mental Illness: A Pragmatic Trial Protocol.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Article
- Perceived barriers and facilitators of the implementation of a combined lifestyle intervention with a financial incentive for chronically ill patients.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- [Design and validation of a questionnaire on the attitudes of health professionals towards the official recommendation of influenza vaccination].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2019Article
- Chronically ill patients' preferences for a financial incentive in a lifestyle intervention. Results of a discrete choice experiment.PloS one · 2019Article
- Parental Perspectives on Financial Incentives for Adolescents: Findings From Qualitative Interviews.Global pediatric health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is evidence that financial incentive interventions, which include both financial rewards and also penalties, are effective in encouraging healthy behaviours. However, concerns about the acceptability of such interventions remain. We report on focus groups with a cross-section of adults from North East England exploring their acceptance of financial incentive interventions for encouraging healthy behaviours amongst adults. Such information should help guide the design and development of acceptable, and effective, financial incentive interventions.
methodsEight focus groups with a total of 74 adults were conducted between November 2013 and January 2014 in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Focus groups lasted approximately 60 minutes and explored factors that made financial incentives acceptable and unacceptable to participants, together with discussions on preferred formats for financial incentives. Verbatim transcripts were thematically coded and analysed in Nvivo 10.
resultsParticipants largely distrusted health promoting financial incentives, with a concern that individuals may abuse such schemes. There was, however, evidence that health promoting financial incentives may be more acceptable if they are fair to all recipients and members of the public; if they are closely monitored and evaluated; if they are shown to be effective and cost-effective; and if clear health education is provided alongside health promoting financial incentives. There was also a preference for positive rewards rather than negative penalties, and for shopping vouchers rather than cash incentives.
conclusionsThis qualitative empirical research has highlighted clear suggestions on how to design health promoting financial incentives to maximise acceptability to the general public. It will also be important to determine the acceptability of health promoting financial incentives in a range of stakeholders, and in particular, those who fund such schemes, and policy-makers who are likely to be involved with the design, implementation and evaluation of health promoting financial incentive schemes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.