Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25636316›Full record

Trial reportHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2015

Mediators and Moderators of the Effectiveness of a Community Health Worker Intervention That Improved Dietary Outcomes in Pregnant Latino Women.

Megha K Shah, Edith C Kieffer, Hwajung Choi, Christina Schumann, Michele Heisler

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Megha K ShahEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA meghakshah@gmail.com.
Edith C KiefferUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Hwajung ChoiUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Christina SchumannCommunity Health and Social Services Center (CHASS), Inc., Detroit, MI, USA.
Michele HeislerUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USEmory University · USHealth Services Center · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

PUBLIC HEALTH DEMONSTRATIONP60DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MYERS, MARTIN G · 1985 to 2012
$26.5M
Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
PROMOTING HEALTHY LIFESTYLES AMONG WOMENR18DK062344 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KIEFFER, EDITH C. · 2002 to 2006
$3.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK062344PHS HHS R40 MC00115-03PHS HHS U48/CCUS1577S-/SIP 10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy is an opportune time to initiate diabetes prevention strategies for minority and underserved women, using culturally tailored interventions delivered by community health workers. A community-partnered randomized controlled trial (RCT) with pregnant Latino women resulted in significantly improved vegetable, fiber, added sugar, and total fat consumption compared to a minimal intervention group. However, studying RCT intervention effects alone does not explain the mechanisms by which the intervention was successful or help identify which participants may have benefitted most. PURPOSE: To improve the development and targeting of future community health worker interventions for high-risk pregnant women, we examined baseline characteristics (moderators) and potential mechanisms (mediators) associated with these dietary changes.

methodSecondary analysis of data for 220 Latina RCT participants was conducted. A linear regression with effects for intervention group, moderator, and interaction between intervention group and moderator was used to test each hypothesized moderator of dietary changes. Sobel-Goodman mediation test was used to assess mediating effects on dietary outcomes.

resultsResults varied by dietary outcome. Improvements in vegetable consumption were greatest for women who reported high spousal support at baseline. Women younger than age 30 were more likely to reduce added sugar consumption than older women. Participants who reported higher baseline perceived control were more likely to reduce fat consumption. No examined mediators were significantly associated with intervention effects.

conclusionFuture interventions with pregnant Latinas may benefit from tailoring dietary goals to consider age, level of spousal support, and perceived control to eat healthy.

Indexed as

Hispanic or LatinoMaternal-Child Health ServicesAdultCommunity Health WorkersDietFeeding BehaviorFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansMichiganPregnancyYoung Adultcommunity-based participatory researchcommunity healthdiabetesLatinomaternal and child healthrace/ethnicity

Identifiers

PMID25636316
PMCPMC4520781
OpenAlexW2112575234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.