Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25636133›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2015

How do bacteria tune translation efficiency?

Gene-Wei Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Collided ribosomes are rescued by the endonuclease Rae1 andbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gene-Wei LiDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States. Electronic address: gwli@mit.edu.

Funding

Probing the function of translational pausing in bacterial protein synthesisR00GM105913 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LI, GENE-WEI · 2015 to 2017
$747k
Probing the function of translational pausing in bacterial protein synthesisK99GM105913 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LI, GENE-WEI · 2013 to 2014
$180k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM105913NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM105913NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM105913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial proteins are translated with precisely determined rates to meet cellular demand. In contrast, efforts to express recombinant proteins in bacteria are often met with large unpredictability in their levels of translation. The disconnect between translation of natural and synthetic mRNA stems from the lack of understanding of the strategy used by bacteria to tune translation efficiency (TE). The development of array-based oligonucleotide synthesis and ribosome profiling provides new approaches to address this issue. Although the major determinant for TE is still unknown, these high-throughput studies point out a statistically significant but mild contribution from the mRNA secondary structure around the start codon. Here I summarize those findings and provide a theoretical framework for measuring TE.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisBacteriaBacterial ProteinsNucleic Acid ConformationRecombinant ProteinsRibosomesRNA, MessengerBacterial ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25636133
PMCPMC4678177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.