Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25636084›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2014

The combined effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and renal replacement therapy on meropenem pharmacokinetics: a matched cohort study.

Kiran Shekar, John F Fraser, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Susan Welch, Steven C Wallis, Daniel V Mullany, Jeffrey Lipman, Jason A Roberts, ASAP ECMO Study Investigators

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Impact of extracorporeal circuits on systemic drug levels - a scoping review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Meropenem extraction by ex vivo extracorporeal life support circuits.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2023
    Article
  13. Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kiran ShekarCritical Care Research Group, Adult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital and The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. kiran.shekar@health.qld.gov.au.
John F FraserCritical Care Research Group, Adult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital and The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. john.fraser@uq.edu.au.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 808, Route de Lennik, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. ftaccone@ulb.ac.be.
Susan WelchIntensive Care Services, St Vincent's Hospital, 683 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia. swelch@stvincents.com.au.
Steven C WallisBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. s.wallis@uq.edu.au.
Daniel V MullanyCritical Care Research Group, Adult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital and The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. dan.mullany@health.qld.gov.au.
Jeffrey LipmanBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. j.lipman@uq.edu.au.
Jason A RobertsBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. j.roberts2@uq.edu.au.
ASAP ECMO Study Investigators
University of Queensland · AUUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe scope of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is expanding; however, optimal drug prescription during ECMO remains a developing science. Currently, there are no clear guidelines for antibiotic dosing during ECMO. This open-label, descriptive, matched-cohort pharmacokinetics (PK) study aimed to compare the PK of meropenem in ECMO patients to critically ill patients with sepsis not receiving ECMO (controls).

methodsEleven adult patients on ECMO (venovenous (VV) ECMO, n = 6; venoarterial (VA) ECMO, n = 5) receiving intravenous (IV) meropenem were included. Meropenem plasma concentrations were determined using validated chromatography. Population PK analysis was performed using non-linear mixed effects modelling. This data was compared with previously published meropenem PK data from 10 critically ill adult patients not on ECMO (preserved renal function (n = 5) or receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) (n = 5). Using these data, we then performed Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1,000) to describe the effect of creatinine clearance on meropenem plasma concentrations.

resultsIn total, five (two VV, three VA) out of eleven ECMO patients received RRT. The other six patients (four VV, two VA) had no significant impairment in renal function. A two-compartment model adequately described the data. ECMO patients had numerically higher volume of distribution (0.45 ± 0.17 versus 0.41 ± 0.13 L/kg, P = 0.21) and lower clearance compared to controls (7.9 ± 5.9 versus 11.7 ± 6.5 L/h, P = 0.18). Variability in meropenem clearance was correlated with creatinine clearance or the presence of RRT. The observed median trough concentrations in the controls were 4.2 (0.0 to 5.7) mg/L. In ECMO patients, while trough meropenem concentrations >2 mg/L were achieved in all patients, a more aggressive target of >8 mg/L for less susceptible microorganisms was observed in only eight out of eleven patients, with five of them being on RRT.

conclusionsECMO patients exhibit high PK variability. Decreased meropenem CL on ECMO appears to compensate for ECMO and critical illness-related increases in volume of distribution. Routine target concentrations >2 mg/L are maintained with standard dosing (1 g IV 8-hourly). However, an increase in dose may be necessary when targeting higher concentrations or in patients with elevated creatinine clearance.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationRenal Replacement TherapyAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMeropenemMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodSepsisThienamycinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemThienamycins

Identifiers

PMID25636084
PMCPMC4302127
OpenAlexW2131361484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.