Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25635922›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Estimating the clinical and economic benefit associated with incremental improvements in sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitis C.

Phil McEwan, Thomas Ward, Hayley Bennett, Anupama Kalsekar, Samantha Webster, Michael Brenner, Yong Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hepatitis C disease transmission and treatment uptake: impact on the cost-effectiveness of new direct-acting antiviral therapies.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Phil McEwanHEOR Ltd, Singleton Court Business Park, Monmouth, Wales, United Kingdom; Swansea Centre for Health Economics, School of Human & Health Sciences, Swansea University, Wales, United Kingdom.
Thomas WardHEOR Ltd, Singleton Court Business Park, Monmouth, Wales, United Kingdom; Swansea Centre for Health Economics, School of Human & Health Sciences, Swansea University, Wales, United Kingdom.
Hayley BennettHEOR Ltd, Singleton Court Business Park, Monmouth, Wales, United Kingdom.
Anupama KalsekarGlobal Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Samantha WebsterHEOR Ltd, Singleton Court Business Park, Monmouth, Wales, United Kingdom.
Michael BrennerBristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Yong YuanGlobal Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the principle causes of chronic liver disease. Successful treatment significantly decreases the risk of hepatic morbidity and mortality. Current standard of care achieves sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of 40-80%; however, the HCV therapy landscape is rapidly evolving. The objective of this study was to quantify the clinical and economic benefit associated with increasing levels of SVR.

methodsA published Markov model (MONARCH) that simulates the natural history of hepatitis C over a lifetime horizon was used. Discounted and non-discounted life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost of complication management were estimated for various plausible SVR rates. To demonstrate the robustness of projections obtained, the model was validated to ten UK-specific HCV studies.

resultsQALY estimates ranged from 18.0 years for those treated successfully in fibrosis stage F0 to 7.5 years (discounted) for patients in fibrosis stage F4 who remain untreated. Predicted QALY gains per 10% improvement in SVR ranged from 0.23 (F0) to 0.64 (F4) and 0.58 (F0) to 1.35 (F4) in 40 year old patients (discounted and non-discounted results respectively). In those aged 40, projected discounted HCV-related costs are minimised with successful treatment in F0/F1 (at approximately £ 300), increasing to £ 49,300 in F4 patients who remain untreated. Validation of the model to published UK cost-effectiveness studies produce R2 goodness of fit statistics of 0.988, 0.978 and of 0.973 for total costs, QALYs and incremental cost effectiveness ratios, respectively.

conclusionProjecting the long-term clinical and economic consequences associated with chronic hepatitis C is a necessary requirement for the evaluation of new treatments. The principle analysis demonstrates the significant impact on expected costs, LYs and QALYs associated with increasing SVR. A validation analysis demonstrated the robustness of the results reported.

Indexed as

AdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFibrosisHepatitis C, ChronicHumansLife ExpectancyLinear ModelsLiverMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalQuality-Adjusted Life YearsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID25635922
PMCPMC4311930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.