Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25635863›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Baseline magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve provides limited predictive information on short-term recovery after acute optic neuritis.

Sebastian Berg, Iris Kaschka, Kathrin S Utz, Konstantin Huhn, Alexandra Lämmer, Robert Lämmer, Anne Waschbisch, Stephan Kloska, De-Hyung Lee, Arnd Doerfler and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian BergDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Iris KaschkaDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Kathrin S UtzDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Konstantin HuhnDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Alexandra LämmerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Robert LämmerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Anne WaschbischDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Stephan KloskaDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
De-Hyung LeeDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Arnd DoerflerDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Ralf A LinkerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn acute optic neuritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may help to confirm the diagnosis as well as to exclude alternative diagnoses. Yet, little is known on the value of optic nerve imaging for predicting clinical symptoms or therapeutic outcome. PURPOSE: To evaluate the benefit of optic nerve MRI for predicting response to appropriate therapy and recovery of visual acuity.

methodsClinical data as well as visual evoked potentials (VEP) and MRI results of 104 patients, who were treated at the Department of Neurology with clinically definite optic neuritis between December 2010 and September 2012 were retrospectively reviewed including a follow up within 14 days.

resultsBoth length of the Gd enhancing lesion (r = -0.38; p = 0.001) and the T2 lesion (r = -0.25; p = 0.03) of the optic nerve in acute optic neuritis showed a medium correlation with visual acuity after treatment. Although visual acuity pre-treatment was little but nonsignificantly lower if Gd enhancement of the optic nerve was detected via orbital MRI, improvement of visual acuity after adequate therapy was significantly better (0.40 vs. 0.24; p = 0.04). Intraorbitally located Gd enhancing lesions were associated with worse visual improvement compared to canalicular, intracranial and chiasmal lesions (0.35 vs. 0.54; p = 0.02).

conclusionOrbital MRI is a broadly available, valuable tool for predicting the improvement of visual function. While the accurate individual prediction of long-term outcomes after appropriate therapy still remains difficult, lesion length of Gd enhancement and T2 lesion contribute to its prediction and a better short-term visual outcome may be associated with detection and localization of Gd enhancement along the optic nerve.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEyeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisOptic NerveOptic NeuritisRadiographyVision DisordersVision, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID25635863
PMCPMC4312052
OpenAlexW2081866763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.