Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25635855›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The complete mitochondrial genomes of three bristletails (Insecta: Archaeognatha): the paraphyly of Machilidae and insights into archaeognathan phylogeny.

Y Ma, K He, P Yu, D Yu, X Cheng, J Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y MaInstitute of Ecology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China; College of Chemistry and Life Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China.
K HeCollege of Chemistry and Life Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China.
P YuInstitute of Ecology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China; College of Chemistry and Life Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China.
D YuInstitute of Ecology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China.
X ChengInstitute of Ecology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China; College of Chemistry and Life Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China.
J ZhangInstitute of Ecology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China; College of Chemistry and Life Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China.
Zhejiang Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The order Archaeognatha was an ancient group of Hexapoda and was considered as the most primitive of living insects. Two extant families (Meinertellidae and Machilidae) consisted of approximately 500 species. This study determined 3 complete mitochondrial genomes and 2 nearly complete mitochondrial genome sequences of the bristletail. The size of the 5 mitochondrial genome sequences of bristletail were relatively modest, containing 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 2 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes and one control region. The gene orders were identical to that of Drosophila yakuba and most bristletail species suggesting a conserved genome evolution within the Archaeognatha. In order to estimate archaeognathan evolutionary relationships, phylogenetic analyses were conducted using concatenated nucleotide sequences of 13 protein-coding genes, with four different computational algorithms (NJ, MP, ML and BI). Based on the results, the monophyly of the family Machilidae was challenged by both datasets (W12 and G12 datasets). The relationships among archaeognathan subfamilies seemed to be tangled and the subfamily Machilinae was also believed to be a paraphyletic group in our study.

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialAnimalsBase CompositionGenes, MitochondrialInsectaMolecular Sequence AnnotationOpen Reading FramesPhylogenyRNA, RibosomalRNA, TransferSequence Analysis, DNARNA, RibosomalRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID25635855
PMCPMC4323385
OpenAlexW2081318378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.