Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25635833›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Effects of the diet on the microbiota of the red palm weevil (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae).

Matteo Montagna, Bessem Chouaia, Giuseppe Mazza, Erica Maria Prosdocimi, Elena Crotti, Valeria Mereghetti, Violetta Vacchini, Annamaria Giorgi, Alessio De Biase, Santi Longo and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Distinct gut bacterial composition inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Matteo MontagnaDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Bessem ChouaiaDipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione, l'Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Giuseppe MazzaConsiglio per la ricerca e la sperimentazione in agricoltura, Research Centre for Agrobiology and Pedology, Cascine del Riccio, Italy.
Erica Maria ProsdocimiDipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione, l'Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Elena CrottiDipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione, l'Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Valeria MereghettiDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Violetta VacchiniDipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione, l'Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Annamaria GiorgiDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Alessio De BiaseDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "C. Darwin", Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza", Roma, Italy.
Santi LongoDipartimento di Gestione dei Sistemi Agroalimentari e Ambientali, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Rita CervoDipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Giuseppe Carlo LozziaDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Alberto AlmaDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Università di Torino, Grugliasco, Italy.
Claudio BandiDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Daniele DaffonchioDipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione, l'Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy; Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, also known as the red palm weevil, is regarded as the major pest of palm trees. Although studies of the microbiota associated with this species have been performed in recent years, little attention has been dedicated to the influence of the diet in shaping the host bacterial community. Here, we investigated the influence of food sources (i.e. palm tissues vs apple based substrate) on the microbial diversity associated with RPW, which was compared with the microbiota associated with wild individuals of the sister species Rhynchophorus vulneratus. The bacterial characterization was performed using a culture independent approach, i.e. the 16S rRNA pyrotag, and a culture dependent approach for a subset of the samples, in order to obtain bacterial isolates from RPW tissues. The bacterial community appeared significantly influenced by diet. Proteobacteria resulted to be the most abundant clade and was present in all the specimens of the three examined weevil groups. Within Proteobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae were identified in all the organs analysed, including hemolymph and reproductive organs. The apple-fed RPWs and the wild R. vulneratus showed a second dominant taxon within Firmicutes that was scarcely present in the microbiota associated with palm-fed RPWs. A comparative analysis on the bacteria associated with the palm tissues highlighted that 12 bacterial genera out of the 13 identified in the plant tissues were also present in weevils, thus indicating that palm tissues may present a source for bacterial acquisition.

Indexed as

DietMicrobiotaAnimalsArecaceaeBacteriaBiodiversityFemaleMaleWeevils

Identifiers

PMID25635833
PMCPMC4311986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.