Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25635675›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Microbial stimulation and succession following a test well injection simulating CO2 leakage into a shallow Newark basin aquifer.

Gregory O'Mullan, M Elias Dueker, Kale Clauson, Qiang Yang, Kelsey Umemoto, Natalia Zakharova, Juerg Matter, Martin Stute, Taro Takahashi, David Goldberg

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregory O'MullanSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, New York, United States of America; Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, United States of America.
M Elias DuekerSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, New York, United States of America; Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, United States of America.
Kale ClausonSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, New York, United States of America.
Qiang YangLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, United States of America.
Kelsey UmemotoDepartment of Environmental Science, Barnard College, New York, New York, United States of America.
Natalia ZakharovaLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, United States of America.
Juerg MatterLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, United States of America; National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Martin StuteLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, United States of America; Department of Environmental Science, Barnard College, New York, New York, United States of America.
Taro TakahashiLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, United States of America.
David GoldbergLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, United States of America.
Columbia University · USLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory · USQueens College, CUNY · USBarnard College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to efforts aimed at reducing anthropogenic production of greenhouse gases, geological storage of CO2 is being explored as a strategy to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas emission and mitigate climate change. Previous studies of the deep subsurface in North America have not fully considered the potential negative effects of CO2 leakage into shallow drinking water aquifers, especially from a microbiological perspective. A test well in the Newark Rift Basin was utilized in two field experiments to investigate patterns of microbial succession following injection of CO2-saturated water into an isolated aquifer interval, simulating a CO2 leakage scenario. A decrease in pH following injection of CO2 saturated aquifer water was accompanied by mobilization of trace elements (e.g. Fe and Mn), and increased bacterial cell concentrations in the recovered water. 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence libraries from samples collected before and after the test well injection were compared to link variability in geochemistry to changes in aquifer microbiology. Significant changes in microbial composition, compared to background conditions, were found following the test well injections, including a decrease in Proteobacteria, and an increased presence of Firmicutes, Verrucomicrobia and microbial taxa often noted to be associated with iron and sulfate reduction. The concurrence of increased microbial cell concentrations and rapid microbial community succession indicate significant changes in aquifer microbial communities immediately following the experimental CO2 leakage event. Samples collected one year post-injection were similar in cell number to the original background condition and community composition, although not identical, began to revert toward the pre-injection condition, indicating microbial resilience following a leakage disturbance. This study provides a first glimpse into the in situ successional response of microbial communities to CO2 leakage after subsurface injection in the Newark Basin and the potential microbiological impact of CO2 leakage on drinking water resources.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial AdhesionCarbon DioxideGeological PhenomenaGroundwaterHydrogenIronMethaneNew YorkOxidation-ReductionPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASulfatesCarbon DioxideHydrogenIronMethaneSulfates

Identifiers

PMID25635675
PMCPMC4312087
OpenAlexW2121009567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.