ReviewAccounts of chemical research2015
Positron emission tomography imaging using radiolabeled inorganic nanomaterials.
Review in Accounts of chemical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 210 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering intrinsically radiolabeled nanoparticles for imaging and therapy: a decade of design strategies and insights.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Structural and functional properties of neodymium-doped hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for biomedical applications.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Synthesis of a novel specific nectin-4 tumor-targeted peptide optical molecular probe and its preliminary study in lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent Advancement of Nanotheranostics in Cancer Applications.Current drug delivery · 2025Review
- Nanotechnology in healthcare, and its safety and environmental risks.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Nanoparticles and bone microenvironment: a comprehensive review for malignant bone tumor diagnosis and treatment.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Exploring innovative strides in radiolabeled nanoparticle progress for multimodality cancer imaging and theranostic applications.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Review
- Graphene quantum dots for biosensing and bioimaging.RSC advances · 2024Review
- Cancer Brachytherapy at the Nanoscale: An Emerging Paradigm.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2024Review
- Smart Biomimetic Nanozymes for Precise Molecular Imaging: Application and Challenges.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Nanomaterial-based contrast agents.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2023Article
- Radiolabeled nanomaterial for cancer diagnostics and therapeutics: principles and concepts.Cancer nanotechnology · 2023Review
- Recent advances in porous nanomaterials-based drug delivery systems for cancer immunotherapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
- Dual-Labelling Strategies for Nuclear and Fluorescence Molecular Imaging: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Graphene and its derivatives: understanding the main chemical and medicinal chemistry roles for biomedical applications.Journal of nanostructure in chemistry · 2022Review
- Cerenkov radiation-activated probes for deep cancer theranostics: a review.Theranostics · 2022Review
- Advances in magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents for glioblastoma-targeting theranostics.Regenerative biomaterials · 2021Review
- Engineering biocompatible TeSeNational science review · 2021Article
- A method to improve quantitative radiotracing-based analysis of the in vivo biodistribution of drug carriers.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2021Article
- Applications of Nanoparticle-Antibody Conjugates in Immunoassays and Tumor Imaging.The AAPS journal · 2021Review
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
conspectusPositron emission tomography (PET) is a radionuclide imaging technology that plays an important role in preclinical and clinical research. With administration of a small amount of radiotracer, PET imaging can provide a noninvasive, highly sensitive, and quantitative readout of its organ/tissue targeting efficiency and pharmacokinetics. Various radiotracers have been designed to target specific molecular events. Compared with antibodies, proteins, peptides, and other biologically relevant molecules, nanoparticles represent a new frontier in molecular imaging probe design, enabling the attachment of different imaging modalities, targeting ligands, and therapeutic payloads in a single vector. We introduce the radiolabeled nanoparticle platforms that we and others have developed. Due to the fundamental differences in the various nanoparticles and radioisotopes, most radiolabeling methods are designed case-by-case. We focus on some general rules about selecting appropriate isotopes for given types of nanoparticles, as well as adjusting the labeling strategies according to specific applications. We classified these radiolabeling methods into four categories: (1) complexation reaction of radiometal ions with chelators via coordination chemistry; (2) direct bombardment of nanoparticles via hadronic projectiles; (3) synthesis of nanoparticles using a mixture of radioactive and nonradioactive precursors; (4) chelator-free postsynthetic radiolabeling. Method 1 is generally applicable to different nanomaterials as long as the surface chemistry is well-designed. However, the addition of chelators brings concerns of possible changes to the physicochemical properties of nanomaterials and detachment of the radiometal. Methods 2 and 3 have improved radiochemical stability. The applications are, however, limited by the possible damage to the nanocomponent caused by the proton beams (method 2) and harsh synthetic conditions (method 3). Method 4 is still in its infancy. Although being fast and specific, only a few combinations of isotopes and nanoparticles have been explored. Since the applications of radiolabeled nanoparticles are based on the premise that the radioisotopes are stably attached to the nanomaterials, stability (colloidal and radiochemical) assessment of radiolabeled nanoparticles is also highlighted. Despite the fact that thousands of nanomaterials have been developed for clinical research, only very few have moved to humans. One major reason is the lack of understanding of the biological behavior of nanomaterials. We discuss specific examples of using PET imaging to monitor the in vivo fate of radiolabeled nanoparticles, emphasizing the importance of labeling strategies and caution in interpreting PET data. Design considerations for radiolabeled nanoplatforms for multimodal molecular imaging are also illustrated, with a focus on strategies to combine the strengths of different imaging modalities and to prolong the circulation time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.