Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25635040›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

Exploring the limits for reduction of plastid genomes: a case study of the mycoheterotrophic orchids Epipogium aphyllum and Epipogium roseum.

Mikhail I Schelkunov, Viktoria Yu Shtratnikova, Maxim S Nuraliev, Marc-Andre Selosse, Aleksey A Penin, Maria D Logacheva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Orchid genome evolution and trait innovation.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pan-Chloroplast Genomes Reveal the Accession-Specific Marker forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Analysis of Codon Usage Bias in the Plastid Genome ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Plastome Evolution, Phylogenomics, and DNA Barcoding Investigation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Organelle Genomes ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Evolution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Characteristics and Comparative Analysis of Seven Complete Plastomes ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mikhail I SchelkunovM. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Viktoria Yu ShtratnikovaM. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Maxim S NuralievM. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Joint Russian-Vietnamese Tropical Scientific and Technological Center, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Marc-Andre SelosseDépartement Systématique et Evolution, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Aleksey A PeninM. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Maria D LogachevaM. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia maria.log@gmail.com.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUInstitut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité · FRKazan Federal University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The question on the patterns and limits of reduction of plastid genomes in nonphotosynthetic plants and the reasons of their conservation is one of the intriguing topics in plant genome evolution. Here, we report sequencing and analysis of plastid genome in nonphotosynthetic orchids Epipogium aphyllum and Epipogium roseum, which, with sizes of 31 and 19 kbp, respectively, represent the smallest plastid genomes characterized by now. Besides drastic reduction, which is expected, we found several unusual features of these "minimal" plastomes: Multiple rearrangements, highly biased nucleotide composition, and unprecedentedly high substitution rate. Only 27 and 29 genes remained intact in the plastomes of E. aphyllum and E. roseum-those encoding ribosomal components, transfer RNAs, and three additional housekeeping genes (infA, clpP, and accD). We found no signs of relaxed selection acting on these genes. We hypothesize that the main reason for retention of plastid genomes in Epipogium is the necessity to translate messenger RNAs (mRNAs) of accD and/or clpP proteins which are essential for cell metabolism. However, these genes are absent in plastomes of several plant species; their absence is compensated by the presence of a functional copy arisen by gene transfer from plastid to the nuclear genome. This suggests that there is no single set of plastid-encoded essential genes, but rather different sets for different species and that the retention of a gene in the plastome depends on the interaction between the nucleus and plastids.

Indexed as

Genome, PlastidGenome SizeBase CompositionCodonDNA, PlantEvolution, MolecularGene ExpressionGenes, PlantMutationOrchidaceaePhylogenyPlant ProteinsPolymorphism, GeneticRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidRNA, TransferCodonDNA, PlantPlant ProteinsRNA, Transfergene lossgenome reductionnonphotosynthetic plantsorchidsplastid genome

Identifiers

PMID25635040
PMCPMC4419786
OpenAlexW2167151041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.