Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25635005›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2015

Pressure-limited sustained inflation vs. gradual tidal inflations for resuscitation in preterm lambs.

David G Tingay, Graeme R Polglase, Risha Bhatia, Clare A Berry, Robert J Kopotic, Clinton P Kopotic, Yong Song, Edgardo Szyld, Alan H Jobe, J Jane Pillow

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

David G TingayNeonatal Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Neonatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Neonatal Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1522-4691
Graeme R PolglaseThe Ritchie Centre, MIMR-PHI Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia;
Risha BhatiaNeonatal Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Neonatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Neonatal Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
Clare A BerryCentre for Neonatal Research and Education, School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia;
Robert J KopoticCAS Medical Systems Inc., Branford, Connecticut;
Clinton P KopoticCAS Medical Systems Inc., Branford, Connecticut;
Yong SongCentre for Neonatal Research and Education, School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia;
Edgardo SzyldUniversidad Abierta Interamericana (UAI), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; and.
Alan H JobeCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Centre, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J Jane PillowCentre for Neonatal Research and Education, School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia; jane.pillow@uwa.edu.au.
The University of Western Australia · AUECA Medical (United States) · USRoyal Children's Hospital · AUCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USHudson Institute of Medical Research · AUUniversidad Abierta Interamericana · AR

Funding

Initiation and Progression of Preterm Lung Injury with VentilationR01HD072842 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI JOBE, ALAN H · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Support of the mechanically complex preterm lung needs to facilitate aeration while avoiding ventilation heterogeneities: whether to achieve this gradually or quickly remains unclear. We compared the effect of gradual vs. constant tidal inflations and a pressure-limited sustained inflation (SI) at birth on gas exchange, lung mechanics, gravity-dependent lung volume distribution, and lung injury in 131-day gestation preterm lambs. Lambs were resuscitated with either 1) a 20-s, 40-cmH2O pressure-limited SI (PressSI), 2) a gradual increase in tidal volume (Vt) over 5-min from 3 ml/kg to 7 ml/kg (IncrVt), or 3) 7 ml/kg Vt from birth. All lambs were subsequently ventilated for 15 min with 7 ml/kg Vt with the same end-expiratory pressure. Lung mechanics, gas exchange and spatial distribution of end-expiratory volume (EEV), and tidal ventilation (electrical impedance tomography) were recorded regularly. At 15 min, early mRNA tissue markers of lung injury were assessed. The IncrVt group resulted in greater tissue hysteresivity at 5 min (P = 0.017; two-way ANOVA), higher alveolar-arterial oxygen difference from 10 min (P < 0.01), and least uniform gravity-dependent distribution of EEV. There were no other differences in lung mechanics between groups, and the PressSI and 7 ml/kg Vt groups behaved similarly throughout. EEV was more uniformly distributed, but Vt least so, in the PressSI group. There were no differences in mRNA markers of lung injury. A gradual increase in Vt from birth resulted in less recruitment of the gravity-dependent lung with worse oxygenation. There was no benefit of a SI at birth over mechanical ventilation with 7 ml/kg Vt.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLung InjuryPositive-Pressure RespirationPressureRespiration, ArtificialResuscitationSheepTreatment Outcomeinfantlung recruitmentmechanical ventilationnewbornresuscitationventilation homogeneity

Identifiers

PMID25635005
PMCPMC4459928
OpenAlexW2033845121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.