Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25635004›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2015

Predicting the response of the injured lung to the mechanical breath profile.

Bradford J Smith, Lennart K A Lundblad, Michaela Kollisch-Singule, Joshua Satalin, Gary Nieman, Nader Habashi, Jason H T Bates

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Unshrinking the baby lung to calm the VILI vortex.Critical care (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The POOR Get POORer: A Hypothesis for the Pathogenesis of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The time-controlled adaptive ventilation protocol: mechanistic approach to reducing ventilator-induced lung injury.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Alveolar Micromechanics in Bleomycin-induced Lung Injury.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Ventilator-induced lung injury and lung mechanics.Annals of translational medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bradford J SmithVermont Lung Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont;
Lennart K A LundbladVermont Lung Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont;
Michaela Kollisch-SinguleDepartment of Surgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York; and.
Joshua SatalinDepartment of Surgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York; and.
Gary NiemanDepartment of Surgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York; and.
Nader HabashiR. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jason H T BatesVermont Lung Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont; jason.h.bates@uvm.edu.
SUNY Upstate Medical University · USUniversity of Vermont · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Training in Lung BiologyT32HL076122 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI IRVIN, CHARLES G, POYNTER, MATTHEW E · 2004 to 2023
$6.1M
Translational Research in Lung Biology and DiseaseP30GM103532 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI IRVIN, CHARLES G · 2012 to 2016
$3.7M
Electroporation-mediated Pulmonary Gene Transfer for Acute Lung InjuryR21HL092801 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DEAN, DAVID A · 2008 to 2012
$2.9M
Personalized Mechanical Ventilation for the Injured LungR01HL124052 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI BATES, JASON HT · 2014 to 2017
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL-124052NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL-092801NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL092801NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL-076122NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM-103532NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation is a crucial component of the supportive care provided to patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Current practice stipulates the use of a low tidal volume (VT) of 6 ml/kg ideal body weight, the presumptive notion being that this limits overdistension of the tissues and thus reduces volutrauma. We have recently found, however, that airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is efficacious at preventing ventilator-induced lung injury, yet APRV has a very different mechanical breath profile compared with conventional low-VT ventilation. To gain insight into the relative merits of these two ventilation modes, we measured lung mechanics and derecruitability in rats before and following Tween lavage. We fit to these lung mechanics measurements a computational model of the lung that accounts for both the degree of tissue distension of the open lung and the amount of lung derecruitment that takes place as a function of time. Using this model, we predicted how tissue distension, open lung fraction, and intratidal recruitment vary as a function of ventilator settings both for conventional low-VT ventilation and for APRV. Our predictions indicate that APRV is more effective at recruiting the lung than low-VT ventilation, but without causing more overdistension of the tissues. On the other hand, low-VT ventilation generally produces less intratidal recruitment than APRV. Predictions such as these may be useful for deciding on the relative benefits of different ventilation modes and thus may serve as a means for determining how to ventilate a given lung in the least injurious fashion.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalRespiratory MechanicsAnimalsComputer SimulationContinuous Positive Airway PressureElastic ModulusHumansLungLung InjuryMalePrognosisRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecovery of FunctionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityARDSlung injurymechanical ventilationpredictive computational model

Identifiers

PMID25635004
PMCPMC4385881
OpenAlexW2119392681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.