Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25634958›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2015

Chronic exposure to neonicotinoids increases neuronal vulnerability to mitochondrial dysfunction in the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris).

Christopher Moffat, Joao Goncalves Pacheco, Sheila Sharp, Andrew J Samson, Karen A Bollan, Jeffrey Huang, Stephen T Buckland, Christopher N Connolly

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Power ofFrontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher Moffat*Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; and Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom.
Joao Goncalves Pacheco*Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; and Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom.
Sheila Sharp*Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; and Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom.
Andrew J Samson*Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; and Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom.
Karen A Bollan*Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; and Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey Huang*Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; and Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom.
Stephen T Buckland*Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; and Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom.
Christopher N Connolly*Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; and Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom c.n.connolly@dundee.ac.uk.
University of Dundee · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/1000313/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global decline in the abundance and diversity of insect pollinators could result from habitat loss, disease, and pesticide exposure. The contribution of the neonicotinoid insecticides (e.g., clothianidin and imidacloprid) to this decline is controversial, and key to understanding their risk is whether the astonishingly low levels found in the nectar and pollen of plants is sufficient to deliver neuroactive levels to their site of action: the bee brain. Here we show that bumblebees (Bombus terrestris audax) fed field levels [10 nM, 2.1 ppb (w/w)] of neonicotinoid accumulate between 4 and 10 nM in their brains within 3 days. Acute (minutes) exposure of cultured neurons to 10 nM clothianidin, but not imidacloprid, causes a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-dependent rapid mitochondrial depolarization. However, a chronic (2 days) exposure to 1 nM imidacloprid leads to a receptor-dependent increased sensitivity to a normally innocuous level of acetylcholine, which now also causes rapid mitochondrial depolarization in neurons. Finally, colonies exposed to this level of imidacloprid show deficits in colony growth and nest condition compared with untreated colonies. These findings provide a mechanistic explanation for the poor navigation and foraging observed in neonicotinoid treated bumblebee colonies.

Indexed as

AcetylcholinesteraseAnimalsApoptosisBeesBrainCell ProliferationCells, CulturedChromatography, LiquidGuanidinesImidazolesInsecticidesIsotope LabelingMembrane Potential, MitochondrialMitochondriaNeonicotinoidsNeuronsAcetylcholinesteraseclothianidinGuanidinesimidaclopridImidazolesInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsThiazolesneuronal culturenicotinic acetylcholine receptors

Identifiers

PMID25634958
PMCPMC4415021
OpenAlexW2047522481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.