ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2016
Tobacco Control and Health Advocacy in the European Union: Understanding Effective Coalition-Building.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation of school tobacco policies: The advocacy coalition approach. Protocol of the ADHAirE study, a cluster randomized controlled trial.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2025Article
- Vital lessons from struggling partnerships and potential partnerships: an international study with leaders across the health sector.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Tobacco Control in Denmark: How the Ugly Duckling Turned into a Swan.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024Article
- Isolation of starch and protein degrading strainFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Strengthening policies and structures to combat illicit tobacco trade in the Philippines.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Securing Smokefree Laws Covering Casinos and Bars in Louisiana via Messaging, Continuous Campaigning and Health Coalitions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Tobacco control partnership capacity: An overview and comparison of 18 European partnerships.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2021Article
- Historic tobacco legislation in Israel: a moment to celebrate.Israel journal of health policy research · 2020Article
- E-Cigarettes: A Disruptive Technology? An Analysis of Health Actors' Positions on E-Cigarette Regulation in Scotland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Understanding political priority development for public health issues in Turkey: lessons from tobacco control and road safety.Health research policy and systems · 2019Article
- Insights in Public Health: Formative Factors for a Statewide Tobacco Control Advocacy Infrastructure: Insights from Hawai'i.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2019Article
- Who thinks what about e-cigarette regulation? A content analysis of UK newspapers.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2016Article
- Comparing global alcohol and tobacco control efforts: network formation and evolution in international health governance.Health policy and planning · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCoalitions of supporters of comprehensive tobacco control policy have been crucial in achieving policy success nationally and internationally, but the dynamics of such alliances are not well understood.
methodsQualitative semi-structured, narrative interviews with 35 stakeholders involved in developing the European Council Recommendation on smoke-free environments. These were thematically analyzed to examine the dynamics of coalition-building, collaboration and leadership in the alliance of organizations which successfully called for the development of comprehensive European Union (EU) smoke-free policy.
resultsAn alliance of tobacco control and public health advocacy organizations, scientific institutions, professional bodies, pharmaceutical companies, and other actors shared the goal of fighting the harms caused by second-hand smoke. Alliance members jointly called for comprehensive EU smoke-free policy and the protection of the political debates from tobacco industry interference. The alliance's success was enabled by a core group of national and European actors with long-standing experience in tobacco control, who facilitated consensus-building, mobilized allies and synchronized the actions of policy supporters. Representatives of Brussels-based organizations emerged as crucial strategic leaders.
conclusionsThe insights gained and identification of key enablers of successful tobacco control advocacy highlight the strategic importance of investing into tobacco control at European level. Those interested in effective health policy can apply lessons learned from EU smoke-free policy to build effective alliances in tobacco control and other areas of public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.