Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25634765›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2015

Negative feedback buffers effects of regulatory variants.

Daniel M Bader, Stefan Wilkening, Gen Lin, Manu M Tekkedil, Kim Dietrich, Lars M Steinmetz, Julien Gagneur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genetics ofeLife · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel M BaderComputational Genomics, Gene Center, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Stefan WilkeningEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gen LinEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.
Manu M TekkedilEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kim DietrichComputational Genomics, Gene Center, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Lars M SteinmetzEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany Stanford Genome Technology Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Julien GagneurComputational Genomics, Gene Center, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany gagneur@genzentrum.lmu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms conferring robustness against regulatory variants have been controversial. Previous studies suggested widespread buffering of RNA misexpression on protein levels during translation. We do not find evidence that translational buffering is common. Instead, we find extensive buffering at the level of RNA expression, exerted through negative feedback regulation acting in trans, which reduces the effect of regulatory variants on gene expression. Our approach is based on a novel experimental design in which allelic differential expression in a yeast hybrid strain is compared to allelic differential expression in a pool of its spores. Allelic differential expression in the hybrid is due to cis-regulatory differences only. Instead, in the pool of spores allelic differential expression is not only due to cis-regulatory differences but also due to local trans effects that include negative feedback. We found that buffering through such local trans regulation is widespread, typically compensating for about 15% of cis-regulatory effects on individual genes. Negative feedback is stronger not only for essential genes, indicating its functional relevance, but also for genes with low to middle levels of expression, for which tight regulation matters most. We suggest that negative feedback is one mechanism of Waddington's canalization, facilitating the accumulation of genetic variants that might give selective advantage in different environments.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksGenetic VariationAllelesChromosome MappingDatabases, GeneticDNA, FungalEvolution, MolecularGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, FungalGene FrequencyGenotyping TechniquesModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence AnnotationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNADNA, Fungalbufferingcanalizationcis regulationfeedbacktrans regulation

Identifiers

PMID25634765
PMCPMC4332157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.