Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25634754›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2015

In Vitro Evaluation of Probiotic Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria from the Gut of Labeo rohita and Catla catla.

Tapasa Kumar Sahoo, Prasant Kumar Jena, Nidhi Nagar, Amiya Kumar Patel, Sriram Seshadri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ProbioticFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  6. Heliyon · 2023
    Article
  7. Veterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PeerJ · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Efficacy of lyophilized cell-free supernatant ofVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tapasa Kumar SahooSchool of Life Sciences, Sambalpur University, Jyotivihar, Burla, Sambalpur, 768019, Odisha, India.
Prasant Kumar Jena
Nidhi Nagar
Amiya Kumar Patel
Sriram Seshadri
Nirma University · INSambalpur University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the evaluation of probiotic properties of potent lactic acid bacteria (LAB) from the gut of freshwater fishes, Labeo rohita and Catla catla, for eventually developing probiotic strains for the prevention of bacterial infections in aquaculture and food preservation. Five different LAB strains were isolated and characterized for their probiotic properties. Based on physiological, morphological and biochemical characteristics, three isolates from Labeo rohita and two from Catla catla were identified as putative probiotics and were denoted as LR11, LR14 and LR16 and CC3 and CC4, respectively. Isolates CC3 and CC4 were acid (pH 2.5) and bile salt (0.3% oxygall) tolerant and exhibited strong antibacterial activities against all pathogens including Aeromonas hydrophila. In addition, all LAB isolates were susceptible to tested antibiotics, except CC3 and CC4 which were vancomycin resistant. Furthermore, the isolates CC3 and CC4 showed significantly higher in vitro cell surface properties, i.e., hydrophobicity, auto- and co-aggregation. Biochemical tests, PCR detection and 16S rRNA sequence analysis established that LR11, LR14, LR16, CC3 and CC4 are Enterococcus avium TSU11, Enterococcus pseudoavium TSU14, Enterococcus raffinosus TSU16, Lactobacillus gasseri TSU3 and Lactobacillus animalis TSU4, respectively. Studies revealed that, Lactobacillus gasseri TSU3 and Lactobacillus animalis TSU4 are ideal probiotic candidates for its use in aquaculture and require further exploratory in vivo evaluation and safety studies.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAeromonas hydrophilaAnimalsAntibiosisAquacultureCulture MediaCyprinidaeDNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnterococcusFood ContaminationFood MicrobiologyHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsIntestinesCulture MediaDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25634754
OpenAlexW2091493580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.