Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25634542›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2015

Evaluation of a minimally invasive cell sampling device coupled with assessment of trefoil factor 3 expression for diagnosing Barrett's esophagus: a multi-center case-control study.

Caryn S Ross-Innes, Irene Debiram-Beecham, Maria O'Donovan, Elaine Walker, Sibu Varghese, Pierre Lao-Sirieix, Laurence Lovat, Michael Griffin, Krish Ragunath, Rehan Haidry and 17 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05657080 (An Investigation on Cytosponge and Molecular Biomarkers to Identify Patients With Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia), which is not on this map. Cited by 148 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05657080 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

An Investigation on Cytosponge and Molecular Biomarkers to Identify Patients With Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (GIM)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of CambridgeRan2023 to 2024Enrolled226ConditionsGastric Cancer, Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia, Gastric AtrophyArmsCytosponge-TFF3
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Advances in the Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  11. Screening for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: recent advances and next steps.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Barrett's Esophagus.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Endoscopic Screening of Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Emerging Biomarkers for Managing Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. New Approaches to Screening for Barrett Esophagus.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Caryn S Ross-InnesMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Irene Debiram-BeechamMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Maria O'DonovanDepartment of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Elaine WalkerMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sibu VargheseMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Pierre Lao-SirieixMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Laurence LovatUniversity College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Michael GriffinRoyal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Krish RagunathNottingham Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Rehan HaidryUniversity College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Sarmed S SamiNottingham Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Philip KayeNottingham Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Marco NovelliUniversity College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Babett DisepRoyal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Richard OstlerCancer Prevention Trials Unit, London, United Kingdom.
Benoit AigretCancer Prevention Trials Unit, London, United Kingdom.
Bernard V NorthCancer Prevention Trials Unit, London, United Kingdom.
Pradeep BhandariQueen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Adam HaycockSt Mark's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Danielle MorrisEast and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust-QEII and Lister Hospitals, Welwyn Garden City and Stevenage, United Kingdom.
Stephen AttwoodNorthern Region Endoscopy Group, United Kingdom; North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields, United Kingdom.
Anjan DharNorthern Region Endoscopy Group, United Kingdom; County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, United Kingdom.
Colin ReesNorthern Region Endoscopy Group, United Kingdom; South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, United Kingdom.
Matthew D D RutterNorthern Region Endoscopy Group, United Kingdom; North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom.
Peter D SasieniCancer Prevention Trials Unit, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca C FitzgeraldMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
BEST2 Study Group

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12088Cancer Research UK 16892Cancer Research UK 16893Cancer Research UK C14478/A12088Medical Research Council MC_UU_12022/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarrett's esophagus (BE) is a commonly undiagnosed condition that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Routine endoscopic screening for BE is not recommended because of the burden this would impose on the health care system. The objective of this study was to determine whether a novel approach using a minimally invasive cell sampling device, the Cytosponge, coupled with immunohistochemical staining for the biomarker Trefoil Factor 3 (TFF3), could be used to identify patients who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE. METHODS AND

findingsA case-control study was performed across 11 UK hospitals between July 2011 and December 2013. In total, 1,110 individuals comprising 463 controls with dyspepsia and reflux symptoms and 647 BE cases swallowed a Cytosponge prior to endoscopy. The primary outcome measures were to evaluate the safety, acceptability, and accuracy of the Cytosponge-TFF3 test compared with endoscopy and biopsy. In all, 1,042 (93.9%) patients successfully swallowed the Cytosponge, and no serious adverse events were attributed to the device. The Cytosponge was rated favorably, using a visual analogue scale, compared with endoscopy (p < 0.001), and patients who were not sedated for endoscopy were more likely to rate the Cytosponge higher than endoscopy (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.001). The overall sensitivity of the test was 79.9% (95% CI 76.4%-83.0%), increasing to 87.2% (95% CI 83.0%-90.6%) for patients with ≥3 cm of circumferential BE, known to confer a higher cancer risk. The sensitivity increased to 89.7% (95% CI 82.3%-94.8%) in 107 patients who swallowed the device twice during the study course. There was no loss of sensitivity in patients with dysplasia. The specificity for diagnosing BE was 92.4% (95% CI 89.5%-94.7%). The case-control design of the study means that the results are not generalizable to a primary care population. Another limitation is that the acceptability data were limited to a single measure.

conclusionsThe Cytosponge-TFF3 test is safe and acceptable, and has accuracy comparable to other screening tests. This test may be a simple and inexpensive approach to identify patients with reflux symptoms who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE.

Indexed as

AgedBarrett EsophagusBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptidesSensitivity and SpecificityTrefoil Factor-3BiomarkersPeptidesTFF3 protein, humanTrefoil Factor-3

Identifiers

PMID25634542
PMCPMC4310596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.