Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25634211›Full record

ArticleCancer research2015

Tumor Endothelial Cells with Distinct Patterns of TGFβ-Driven Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition.

Lin Xiao, Dae Joong Kim, Clayton L Davis, James V McCann, James M Dunleavey, Alissa K Vanderlinden, Nuo Xu, Samantha G Pattenden, Stephen V Frye, Xia Xu and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. COL3A1NPJ precision oncology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Mechanosensory entities and functionality of endothelial cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lin XiaoDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Dae Joong KimDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Clayton L DavisDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
James V McCannDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
James M DunleaveyDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Alissa K VanderlindenDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Nuo XuDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Samantha G PattendenCenter for Integrative Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Stephen V FryeCenter for Integrative Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Xia XuDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Mark OnaitisDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Elizabeth Monaghan-BensonDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Keith BurridgeDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. McAllister Heart Institute, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Andrew C DudleyDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. McAllister Heart Institute, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. acdudley@med.unc.edu.
Duke University · US

Funding

Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KATHERINE A. HOADLEY · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
Pre-doctoral Training Program in Integrative Vascular BiologyT32HL069768 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Christopher P. Mack · 2002 to 2026
$9.7M
Targeting the vasculature to enhance anti-tumor immunityR01CA177875 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Andrew Carl Dudley · 2014 to 2026
$4.5M
Tumor endothelial cell abnormalitiesR00CA140708 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DUDLEY, ANDREW CARL · 2011 to 2013
$732k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS R00 CA140708NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177875NCI NIH HHS R01-CA177875NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) occurs during development and underlies the pathophysiology of multiple diseases. In tumors, unscheduled EndMT generates cancer-associated myofibroblasts that fuel inflammation and fibrosis, and may contribute to vascular dysfunction that promotes tumor progression. We report that freshly isolated subpopulations of tumor-specific endothelial cells (TEC) from a spontaneous mammary tumor model undergo distinct forms of EndMT in response to TGFβ stimulation. Although some TECs strikingly upregulate α smooth muscle actin (SMA), a principal marker of EndMT and activated myofibroblasts, counterpart normal mammary gland endothelial cells (NEC) showed little change in SMA expression after TGFβ treatment. Compared with NECs, SMA(+) TECs were 40% less motile in wound-healing assays and formed more stable vascular-like networks in vitro when challenged with TGFβ. Lineage tracing using ZsGreen(Cdh5-Cre) reporter mice confirmed that only a fraction of vessels in breast tumors contain SMA(+) TECs, suggesting that not all endothelial cells (EC) respond identically to TGFβ in vivo. Indeed, examination of 84 TGFβ-regulated target genes revealed entirely different genetic signatures in TGFβ-stimulated NEC and TEC cultures. Finally, we found that basic FGF (bFGF) exerts potent inhibitory effects on many TGFβ-regulated genes but operates in tandem with TGFβ to upregulate others. ECs challenged with TGFβ secrete bFGF, which blocks SMA expression in secondary cultures, suggesting a cell-autonomous or lateral-inhibitory mechanism for impeding mesenchymal differentiation. Together, our results suggest that TGFβ-driven EndMT produces a spectrum of EC phenotypes with different functions that could underlie the plasticity and heterogeneity of the tumor vasculature.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell SeparationCell TransdifferentiationEndothelial CellsFemaleFibroblast Growth Factor 2Mammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMice, TransgenicNeoplasm TransplantationTransforming Growth Factor betaFibroblast Growth Factor 2Transforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID25634211
PMCPMC4383705
OpenAlexW2143145016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.