ReviewPediatric cardiology2015
Cardiac regeneration in children.
Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Pulmonary artery banding for dilated cardiomyopathy in children: report of 3 cases.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Patch Materials for Pulmonary Artery Arterioplasty and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Augmentation: A Review.Pediatric cardiology · 2023Review
- Surgical strategies for the management of end-stage heart failure in infants and children: A 15-year experience with a patient-tailored approach.Artificial organs · 2021Article
- Enhancer decommissioning imposes an epigenetic barrier to sensory hair cell regeneration.Developmental cell · 2021Article
- Pulmonary Artery Banding for Ventricular Rehabilitation in Infants With Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Early Results in a Single-Center Experience.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
- Neonatal myocardial infarction: substantial improvement of cardiac function after autologous bone marrow-derived cell therapy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Article
- Advances in heart failure therapy in pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.Heart failure reviews · 2018Review
- Article
- Clinical cardiac regenerative studies in children.World journal of cardiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Very young mammals have an impressive cardiac regeneration capacity. In contrast, cardiac regeneration is very limited in adult humans. The hearts of young children have a higher regenerative capacity compared with adults, as, for example, seen after surgical correction of an anomalous left coronary artery arising from the pulmonary artery or in children with univentricular hearts, who present enormous morphological changes after volume unloading. In addition, the enormous regenerative potential of growing children's hearts is reflected in the spontaneous courses of children with severely deteriorated cardiac function (e.g., patients with dilated cardiomyopathy). The extent of this regenerative capacity and its time dependency remain to be elucidated in the future and should be exploited to improve the treatment of children with severe heart insufficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25633820What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.