Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25633490›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2015

Comparative modeling and benchmarking data sets for human histone deacetylases and sirtuin families.

Jie Xia, Ermias Lemma Tilahun, Eyob Hailu Kebede, Terry-Elinor Reid, Liangren Zhang, Xiang Simon Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Key Topics in Molecular Docking for Drug Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The discovery of novel HDAC3 inhibitors via virtual screening and in vitro bioassay.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jie XiaState Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University , 38 Xueyuan Road, Beijing 100191, China.
Ermias Lemma Tilahun
Eyob Hailu Kebede
Terry-Elinor Reid
Liangren Zhang
Xiang Simon Wang
AIDS United · USHoward University · USJohns Hopkins University Center for AIDS ResearchPeking University · CN

Funding

PROTEOMICS CORE FACILITYG12MD007597 · NIMHD · HOWARD UNIVERSITY · PI SOUTHERLAND, WILLIAM M. · 2012 to 2018
$14.8M
The District of Columbia Developmental Center for AIDS Research (DC D-CFAR)P30AI087714 · NIAID · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, VERONICA · 2010 to 2014
$8.4M
NIAID NIH HHS 5P30AI0877714-02NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI087714NIAID NIH HHS P30AI087714NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007597NIMHD NIH HHS G12MD007597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are an important class of drug targets for the treatment of cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, and other types of diseases. Virtual screening (VS) has become fairly effective approaches for drug discovery of novel and highly selective histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs). To facilitate the process, we constructed maximal unbiased benchmarking data sets for HDACs (MUBD-HDACs) using our recently published methods that were originally developed for building unbiased benchmarking sets for ligand-based virtual screening (LBVS). The MUBD-HDACs cover all four classes including Class III (Sirtuins family) and 14 HDAC isoforms, composed of 631 inhibitors and 24609 unbiased decoys. Its ligand sets have been validated extensively as chemically diverse, while the decoy sets were shown to be property-matching with ligands and maximal unbiased in terms of "artificial enrichment" and "analogue bias". We also conducted comparative studies with DUD-E and DEKOIS 2.0 sets against HDAC2 and HDAC8 targets and demonstrate that our MUBD-HDACs are unique in that they can be applied unbiasedly to both LBVS and SBVS approaches. In addition, we defined a novel metric, i.e. NLBScore, to detect the "2D bias" and "LBVS favorable" effect within the benchmarking sets. In summary, MUBD-HDACs are the only comprehensive and maximal-unbiased benchmark data sets for HDACs (including Sirtuins) that are available so far. MUBD-HDACs are freely available at http://www.xswlab.org/ .

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBenchmarkingDatabases, ChemicalHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHumansLigandsModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularSirtuinsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesLigandsSirtuins

Identifiers

PMID25633490
PMCPMC4677826
OpenAlexW1964031294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.