Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25633400›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing

Aspiration and evaluation of gastric residuals in the neonatal intensive care unit: state of the science.

Leslie Parker, Roberto Murgas Torrazza, Yuefeng Li, Elizabeth Talaga, Jonathan Shuster, Josef Neu

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03548324 nacompletednot on this map

Enteral Nutrition Tolerance and Non-invasive Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Turin, ItalyRan2019 to 2021Enrolled280ConditionsVery Low Birth Weight Infant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant, Enteral Feeding IntoleranceArmsHHHFNC, NCPAP
NCT04062851 nacompletednot on this map

Routine Versus no Assessment of Gastric Residual Volumes in Very Low Birth Weight Infants Receiving Enteral Feeding Via Intermittent Feeding Tubes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealthRan2019 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsGastric Residual Volume, Preterm Infant, Feeding Disorder NeonatalArmsNo Gastric residual volume monitoring
NCT05888090 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Position Given to Preterms After Feeding on Gastric Residual Volume, Abdominal Oxygenation and Fractional Oxygen Extraction

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled48ConditionsGastric Residual Volume, Abdominal Oxygenation, Fractional Oxygen Extraction, Positioning (Prone, Right Lateral and Semi-Elevated Supine Position)ArmsProne, right lateral, and semi-elevated supine positions, Semi-elevated supine, prone, and right lateral positions, Right lateral, semi-elevated supine, and prone positions
NCT06883903 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Day-Night Cycle on the Transition Time to Full Enteral Feeding in Preterm Newborns Receiving Oropharyngeal Colostrum

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiruni UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsFull Enteral Nutrition, the Day and Night CycleArmsday-night cycle application, routine practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Feeding intolerance.Early human development · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Leslie ParkerCollege of Nursing, University of Florida, Box 100187, Gainesville 32610, USA. Parkela@ufl.edu
Roberto Murgas Torrazza
Yuefeng Li
Elizabeth Talaga
Jonathan Shuster
Josef Neu
North Eastern University · THUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
Routine Aspiration of Residual Gastric Contents in Very Low Birth Weight InfantsR01NR014019 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PARKER, LESLIE A · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014019NINR NIH HHS R01NR014019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The routine aspiration of gastric residuals (GR) is considered standard care for critically ill infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Unfortunately, scant information exists regarding the risks and benefits associated with this common procedure. This article provides the state of the science regarding what is known about the routine aspiration and evaluation of GRs in the NICU focusing on the following issues: (1) the use of GRs for verification of feeding tube placement, (2) GRs as an indicator of gastric contents, (3) GRs as an indicator of feeding intolerance or necrotizing enterocolitis, (4) the association between GR volume and ventilator-associated pneumonia, (5) whether GRs should be discarded or refed, (6) the definition of an abnormal GR, and (7) the potential risks associated with aspiration and evaluation of GRs. Recommendations for further research and practice guidelines are also provided.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionRespiratory Aspiration of Gastric ContentsSuctionHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentStandard of Care

Identifiers

PMID25633400
PMCPMC4313388
OpenAlexW2023633024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.