ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic targets2015
Novel molecular targets for urothelial carcinoma.
Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Basis of Tumorigenesis of Bladder Cancer and Emerging Concepts in Developing Therapeutic Targets.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Review
- Metastasectomy in older adults with urothelial carcinoma: Population-based analysis of use and outcomes.Urologic oncology · 2018Article
- Clonal evolution of chemotherapy-resistant urothelial carcinoma.Nature genetics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionUrothelial cancer (UC) remains a significant public health problem, with no new second-line agents FDA-approved in the US. Next-generation sequencing technologies are starting to generate a molecular landscape of UC thus revealing novel molecular targets. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the authors provide a detailed review of novel molecular targets in UC based on published genomic analyses of urothelial tumors. We provide an overview of each molecular target with a brief discussion of therapeutic strategies and clinical trials targeting each pathway. EXPERT OPINION: UC continues to be a lethal disease with no FDA-approved effective second-line therapies. Platinum resistance continues to be a daunting clinical problem. Next-generation sequencing methods have led to the elucidation of numerous molecular targets in UC, including PI3K, to the elucidation of numerous molecular targets in UC, including PI3K, ERBB2 and FGFR3, among many others. These molecular perturbations can be exploited therapeutically with targeted therapies in patient populations enriched for these molecular alterations, thus paving the way for precision medicine in UC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.