ArticleHeart and vessels2016
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with severely impaired left ventricular systolic function.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation on primary prevention ICD eligibility in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Prognostic Significance of Post-Procedural Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients With Systolic Dysfunction.Circulation reports · 2020Article
- Invasive therapies for patients with concomitant heart failure and atrial fibrillation.Heart failure reviews · 2019Review
- Improvement of left ventricular function after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a comprehensive echocardiographic assessment using two-dimensional speckle tracking analysis.Journal of echocardiography · 2019Article
- Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Systolic Heart Failure Patients: Stone by Stone, a CASTLE.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2018Review
- Additional cryoapplications at the pulmonary vein antrum using a 28-mm second-generation cryoballoon: a pilot study of extra-pulmonary vein ablation.Heart and vessels · 2018Article
- Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Cardiac failure review · 2018Review
- Relationship between left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and very late recurrences after multiple procedures for atrial fibrillation ablation.Heart and vessels · 2018Article
- Noninvasive evaluation of reverse atrial remodeling after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation by P wave dispersion.Heart and vessels · 2017Article
- Effect of irbesartan on development of atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation in a canine atrial tachycardia model with left ventricular dysfunction, association with p53.Heart and vessels · 2016Article
- The impact of left atrial pressure on filtered P-wave duration in patients with atrial fibrillation.Heart and vessels · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Little is known about the outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure (HF) and a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We aimed to clarify the effectiveness of catheter ablation of AF in patients with a severely low LVEF. This retrospective study included 18 consecutive patients with HF and an LVEF of ≤ 35 % who underwent catheter ablation of AF. We investigated the clinical parameters, echocardiographic parameters and the incidence of hospitalizations for HF. During a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR, 13-40) after the final procedure (9 with repeat procedures), 11 patients (61 %) maintained sinus rhythm (SR) (6 with amiodarone). The LVEF and NYHA class significantly improved at 6 months after the CA in 12 patients (67 %) who were in SR or had recurrent paroxysmal AF (from 25.8 ± 6.3 to 37.0 ± 11.7 %, P = 0.02, and from 2.3 ± 0.5 to 1.5 ± 0.7, P < 0.01, respectively) but not in patients who experienced recurrent persistent AF. The patients with SR or recurrent paroxysmal AF had significantly fewer hospitalizations for HF than those with recurrent persistent AF after the AF ablation (log-rank test; P < 0.01). Catheter ablation of AF improved the clinical status in patients with an LVEF of ≤ 35 %. A repeat ablation procedure and amiodarone were often necessary to obtain a favorable outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.