Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25632348›Full record

ArticleScientific data2014

A time-indexed reference standard of adverse drug reactions.

Rave Harpaz, David Odgers, Greg Gaskin, William DuMouchel, Rainer Winnenburg, Olivier Bodenreider, Anna Ripple, Ana Szarfman, Alfred Sorbello, Eric Horvitz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rave HarpazCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
David OdgersCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Greg GaskinCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
William DuMouchelOracle Health Sciences, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730, USA.
Rainer WinnenburgNational Library of Medicine, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA.
Olivier BodenreiderNational Library of Medicine, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA.
Anna RippleNational Library of Medicine, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA.
Ana SzarfmanU.S. FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, USA.
Alfred SorbelloU.S. FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, USA.
Eric HorvitzMicrosoft Research, Redmond, Washington 98052, USA.
Ryen W WhiteMicrosoft Research, Redmond, Washington 98052, USA.
Nigam H ShahCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

Funding

STANFORD COMPOSITE(RMI)U54HG004028 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2005 to 2014
$36.2M
Mining health data for drug safety profilesR01GM101430 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, NIGAM H · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 LM999999NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004028NHGRI NIH HHS U54-HG004028NIGMS NIH HHS GM101430- 01A1NIGMS NIH HHS GM101430- 01A1 G.GNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undetected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) pose a major burden on the health system. Data mining methodologies designed to identify signals of novel ADRs are of deep importance for drug safety surveillance. The development and evaluation of these methodologies requires proper reference benchmarks. While progress has recently been made in developing such benchmarks, our understanding of the performance characteristics of the data mining methodologies is limited because existing benchmarks do not support prospective performance evaluations. We address this shortcoming by providing a reference standard to support prospective performance evaluations. The reference standard was systematically curated from drug labeling revisions, such as new warnings, which were issued and communicated by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2013. The reference standard includes 62 positive test cases and 75 negative controls, and covers 44 drugs and 38 events. We provide usage guidance and empirical support for the reference standard by applying it to analyze two data sources commonly mined for drug safety surveillance.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsData MiningDrug EvaluationDrug LabelingHumansMEDLINEReference StandardsTime FactorsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID25632348
PMCPMC4306188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.