Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25632177›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Management of obstructed defecation.

Vlasta Podzemny, Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori, Mario Pescatori

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04892108 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Surgical Treatment of Internal Rectal Prolapse Associated With Obstructed Defecation: Transanal Prolassectomy Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy. Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital of FerraraRan2017 to 2021Enrolled70ConditionsRectal Prolapse, Defecation Disorder, Rectocele, FemaleArmsSTARR (Stapled Trans Anal Rectal Resection), LVR (Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy)
NCT05747027 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transvaginal Rectopexy and Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Obstructed Defecation in Pelvic Organ Prolapse (PROD Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEndeavor HealthRan2024 to 2025Enrolled15ConditionsObstructed Defecation, Pelvic Organ ProlapseArmsLaparoscopic abdominal ventral rectopexy, Transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Beyond stapled transanal rectal resectionWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vlasta PodzemnyVlasta Podzemny, Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori, Mario Pescatori, Coloproctology Unit, Parioli Clinic, 00100 Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo Carlo PescatoriVlasta Podzemny, Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori, Mario Pescatori, Coloproctology Unit, Parioli Clinic, 00100 Rome, Italy.
Mario PescatoriVlasta Podzemny, Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori, Mario Pescatori, Coloproctology Unit, Parioli Clinic, 00100 Rome, Italy.
Instituto de Pesca · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is mainly conservative and mainly consists of fiber diet, bulking laxatives, rectal irrigation or hydrocolontherapy, biofeedback, transanal electrostimulation, yoga and psychotherapy. According to our experience, nearly 20% of the patients need surgical treatment. If we consider ODS an "iceberg syndrome", with "emerging rocks", rectocele and rectal internal mucosal prolapse, that may benefit from surgery, at least two out of ten patients also has "underwater rocks" or occult disorders, such as anismus, rectal hyposensation and anxiety/depression, which mostly require conservative treatment. Rectal prolapse excision or obliterative suture, rectocele and/or enterocele repair, retrograde Malone's enema and partial myotomy of the puborectalis muscle are effective in selected cases. Laparoscopic ventral sacral colporectopexy may be an effective surgical option. Stapled transanal rectal resection may lead to severe complications. The Transtar procedure seems to be safer, when dealing with recto-rectal intussusception. A multidisciplinary approach to ODS provides the best results.

Indexed as

DefecationCombined Modality TherapyConstipationHumansPatient Care TeamPredictive Value of TestsRecovery of FunctionRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeConstipationObstructed defecationPelvic floor rehabilitationRectal prolaxectomyRectopexy

Identifiers

PMID25632177
PMCPMC4306148
OpenAlexW2143656003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.