Trial reportNeurology2015
Placebo effect of medication cost in Parkinson disease: a randomized double-blind study.
Trial report in Neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the neuroprotective effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists in parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Proportion attributable to contextual effects in general medicine: a meta-epidemiological study based on Cochrane reviews.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Does the placebo effect on hot flashes depend on the placebo dose?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Competition and price among brand-name drugs in the same class: A systematic review of the evidence.PLoS medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The placebo response of injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists vs. oral DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT-2 inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Pooled it
- Comprehensive effects of Parkinson's disease multimodal complex treatment (PD-MCT): a two-center prospective trial.Journal of neurology · 2026Trial
- Modeling Disease Progression and Placebo Response in Huntington Disease: Insights From Enroll-HD and GENERATION HD1 Cohorts.Neurology · 2025Trial
- Nabilone for non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease: a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, enriched enrolment randomized withdrawal study (The NMS-Nab Study).Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2019Trial
- Generic-reference and generic-generic bioequivalence of forty-two, randomly-selected, on-market generic products of fourteen immediate-release oral drugs.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2017Trial
- Caregiver placebo effect in analgesic clinical trials for cats with naturally occurring degenerative joint disease-associated pain.The Veterinary record · 2017Trial
- Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Pilot Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015Trial
- Brain-Computer Interfaces: The Dawn of a New Era in Disease Treatment.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- A single-centre analysis of a biosimilar switching programme for adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Functional Movement Disorders and Deep Brain Stimulation: A Review.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Review
- Differences between patient- and therapist-rated working alliance and their relationships with physical rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with Parkinson's disease.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025Article
- Launch and Post-Launch Prices of Injectable Cancer Drugs in the US: Clinical Benefit, Innovation, Epidemiology, and Competition.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- A Dose of Reality About Dose-Response Relationships.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Review
- Immunotherapy trials in Parkinson's disease: challenges.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Expensive seems better: The price of a non-effective drug modulates its perceived efficacy.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byAuthor response.2015
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the effect of cost, a traditionally "inactive" trait of intervention, as contributor to the response to therapeutic interventions.
methodsWe conducted a prospective double-blind study in 12 patients with moderate to severe Parkinson disease and motor fluctuations (mean age 62.4 ± 7.9 years; mean disease duration 11 ± 6 years) who were randomized to a "cheap" or "expensive" subcutaneous "novel injectable dopamine agonist" placebo (normal saline). Patients were crossed over to the alternate arm approximately 4 hours later. Blinded motor assessments in the "practically defined off" state, before and after each intervention, included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subscale, the Purdue Pegboard Test, and a tapping task. Measurements of brain activity were performed using a feedback-based visual-motor associative learning functional MRI task. Order effect was examined using stratified analysis.
resultsAlthough both placebos improved motor function, benefit was greater when patients were randomized first to expensive placebo, with a magnitude halfway between that of cheap placebo and levodopa. Brain activation was greater upon first-given cheap but not upon first-given expensive placebo or by levodopa. Regardless of order of administration, only cheap placebo increased activation in the left lateral sensorimotor cortex and other regions.
conclusionExpensive placebo significantly improved motor function and decreased brain activation in a direction and magnitude comparable to, albeit less than, levodopa. Perceptions of cost are capable of altering the placebo response in clinical studies. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that perception of cost is capable of influencing motor function and brain activation in Parkinson disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.