Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25631989›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

Context sensitivity in action decreases along the autism spectrum: a predictive processing perspective.

Colin J Palmer, Bryan Paton, Melissa Kirkovski, Peter G Enticott, Jakob Hohwy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontal Disorders and Consciousness: A Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reduced Primacy Bias in Autism during Early Sensory Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Visuo-motor attention during object interaction in children with developmental coordination disorder.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Colin J PalmerCognition and Philosophy Lab, Department of Philosophy, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia colin.palmer@monash.edu.
Bryan PatonCognition and Philosophy Lab, Department of Philosophy, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Melissa KirkovskiMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.
Peter G EnticottMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.
Jakob HohwyCognition and Philosophy Lab, Department of Philosophy, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent predictive processing accounts of perception and action point towards a key challenge for the nervous system in dynamically optimizing the balance between incoming sensory information and existing expectations regarding the state of the environment. Here, we report differences in the influence of the preceding sensory context on motor function, varying with respect to both clinical and subclinical features of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Reach-to-grasp movements were recorded subsequent to an inactive period in which illusory ownership of a prosthetic limb was induced. We analysed the sub-components of reach trajectories derived using a minimum-jerk fitting procedure. Non-clinical adults low in autistic features showed disrupted movement execution following the illusion compared to a control condition. By contrast, individuals higher in autistic features (both those with ASD and non-clinical individuals high in autistic traits) showed reduced sensitivity to the presence of the illusion in their reaching movements while still exhibiting the typical perceptual effects of the illusion. Clinical individuals were distinct from non-clinical individuals scoring high in autistic features, however, in the early stages of movement. These results suggest that the influence of high-level representations of the environment differs between individuals, contributing to clinical and subclinical differences in motor performance that manifest in a contextual manner. As high-level representations of context help to explain fluctuations in sensory input over relatively longer time scales, more circumscribed sensitivity to prior or contextual information in autistic sensory processing could contribute more generally to reduced social comprehension, sensory impairments and a stronger desire for predictability and routine.

Indexed as

IllusionsMovementAdultAutism Spectrum DisorderFemaleHandHand StrengthHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceSomatosensory DisordersYoung Adultautismautistic traitsmovementpredictive codingrubber-hand illusion

Identifiers

PMID25631989
PMCPMC4344134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.