Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25631635›Full record

Trial reportBMC nephrology2015

A personalized follow-up of kidney transplant recipients using video conferencing based on a 1-year scoring system predictive of long term graft failure (TELEGRAFT study): protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Yohann Foucher, Aurélie Meurette, Pascal Daguin, Angélique Bonnaud-Antignac, Jean-Benoît Hardouin, Sabrina Chailan, Karine Neau, Emmanuelle Papuchon, Sandra Gaboriau, Christophe Legendre and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC nephrology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01615900 (Randomized Open Label Study Evaluating the Coverage by Teleconsultation Versus Standard Follow-up of Renal Transplant Patients According to a Risk Score of Early Graft Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01615900 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Open Label Study Evaluating the Coverage by Teleconsultation Versus Standard Follow-up of Renal Transplant Patients According to a Risk Score of Early Graft Failure (KTFS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNantes University HospitalRan2012 to 2020Enrolled155ConditionsRenal Transplant PatientArmsTeleconsultation / Standard consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. eHealth interventions for people with chronic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Terminally Differentiated Effector Memory CD8Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yohann FoucherSPHERE (EA4275) - Biostatistics, Clinical Research and Pharmaco-Epidemiology, Nantes University, Nantes, France. Yohann.Foucher@univ-nantes.fr.
Aurélie MeuretteInstitut de Transplantation et de Recherche en Transplantation, ITUN, CHU Nantes, Nantes University Hospital, 30, Boulevard Jean Monnet, Nantes, 44035, France. aurelie.meurette@chu-nantes.fr.
Pascal DaguinInstitut de Transplantation et de Recherche en Transplantation, ITUN, CHU Nantes, Nantes University Hospital, 30, Boulevard Jean Monnet, Nantes, 44035, France. pascal.daguin@chu-nantes.fr.
Angélique Bonnaud-AntignacSPHERE (EA4275) - Biostatistics, Clinical Research and Pharmaco-Epidemiology, Nantes University, Nantes, France. angelique.bonnaud@univ-nantes.fr.
Jean-Benoît HardouinSPHERE (EA4275) - Biostatistics, Clinical Research and Pharmaco-Epidemiology, Nantes University, Nantes, France. jean-benoit.hardouin@univ-nantes.fr.
Sabrina ChailanDélégation à la recherche clinique et à l'innovation, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France. Sabrina.CHAILAN@chu-nantes.fr.
Karine NeauDélégation à la recherche clinique et à l'innovation, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France. Karine.NEAU@chu-nantes.fr.
Emmanuelle PapuchonInstitut de Transplantation et de Recherche en Transplantation, ITUN, CHU Nantes, Nantes University Hospital, 30, Boulevard Jean Monnet, Nantes, 44035, France. emmanuelle.papuchon@chu-nantes.fr.
Sandra GaboriauInstitut de Transplantation et de Recherche en Transplantation, ITUN, CHU Nantes, Nantes University Hospital, 30, Boulevard Jean Monnet, Nantes, 44035, France. Sandra.GABORIAU@chu-nantes.fr.
Christophe LegendreService de Transplantation Rénale et de Soins Intensifs, Hôpital Necker, APHP and Universités Paris Descartes et Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France. christophe.legendre@nck.ap-hop-paris.fr.
Emmanuel MorélonService de Néphrologie, Transplantation et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France. emmanuel.morelon@chu-lyon.fr.
Philippe TessierSPHERE (EA4275) - Biostatistics, Clinical Research and Pharmaco-Epidemiology, Nantes University, Nantes, France. philippe.tessier@univ-nantes.fr.
Magali GiralSPHERE (EA4275) - Biostatistics, Clinical Research and Pharmaco-Epidemiology, Nantes University, Nantes, France. magali.giral@chu-nantes.fr.
Institut de Transplantation Urologie en Nephrologie · FRCentre d'Investigation Clinique de Nantes · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Edouard Herriot · FRInserm · FRNantes Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous well-established clinical parameters are taken into consideration for the follow-up adaptation of kidney transplant recipients, but there are important disparities between countries, centres and clinicians. Therefore, novel scoring systems have been developed, for instance the Kidney Transplant Failure Score (KTFS) which aims to stratify patients according to their risk of return to dialysis. We hypothesize that the efficiency of the follow-up after one year post-transplantation can be improved by adapting it to the risk of graft failure defined by the KTFS estimation. METHODS/

designWe propose a phase IV, open label, randomized, multicentric and prospective study. The study is registered with the Clinical Trials Registry NCT01615900. 250 patients will be allocated to one of two arms: the eHealth program versus the standard of care at hospital. In the standard group, patients classified at low-risk (KTFS ≤ 4.17) will be scheduled 4 visits at hospital per year, whilst high-risk patients will visit hospital 6 times. In the eHealth group, patients classified at low-risk will be interviewed 3 times by video conferencing and once at hospital, whilst 6 visits at hospital and 6 video conferencing will be scheduled for high-risk patients. DISCUSSION: The current study allows to scientifically evaluate the etiologic impact of a novel eHealth program. This is important to clarify the possible contribution of telemedicine in the improvement of medical follow-up. The proposed design based on 4 different sub-groups can be interesting to evaluate other personalized medicine programs.

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalVideoconferencingFemaleGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationMaleTelemedicineImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID25631635
PMCPMC4417310
OpenAlexW2147305454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.