ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2015
Relation between ticagrelor response and levels of circulating reticulated platelets in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of gender on immature platelet count and its relationship with coronary artery disease.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2020Article
- Newly Formed Reticulated Platelets Undermine Pharmacokinetically Short-Lived Antiplatelet Therapies.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2017Article
- Impact of diabetes on immature platelets fraction and its relationship with platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2016Article
- Relationship between ADP-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength and anti-platelet responsiveness in ticagrelor treated ACS patients.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antiplatelet responses to clopidogrel and prasugrel are highly variable and subject to significant rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The proportion of circulating young reticulated platelets (RPs) inversely correlates with responsiveness to both agents. We aimed to determine the relationship between RPs and on-treatment platelet reactivity in ticagrelor-treated patients. Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) treated with PCI and ticagrelor were tested for platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and multiplate aggregometry. RPs levels were determined using flow cytometry with thiazole orange staining. Tests were performed at 2-4 and 30 days post-PCI. Fifty three patients were included (mean age 62.6 ± 9.8 years, 18.9 % women, 35.8 % diabetes), of which 41 patients (77 %) completed follow-up. Variability in response to ticagrelor was very low according to both assays with no identified cases of HTPR at either time-point. In addition, there were no differences in platelet reactivity, as analyzed by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, or in the proportion of RPs between the two time points (p > 0.5). With the multiplate assay, platelet reactivity increased between the two time-points (8.6 ± 6.0 vs. 15.5 ± 11 AU*min; p = 0.0007). There was no significant correlation between RPs and platelet reactivity at both time-points and using both assays (p > 0.5). There were no cases of HTPR up to 30-days post-PCI in patients with NSTE-ACS treated with ticagrelor. In this cohort, no correlation between % RPs and platelet reactivity was observed. Attenuation of RP-induced platelet reactivity as a novel mechanism for ticagrelor's benefit requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25631351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.