Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25631295›Full record

Trial reportPublic health nutrition2015

A cluster-randomized trial determining the efficacy of caterpillar cereal as a locally available and sustainable complementary food to prevent stunting and anaemia.

Melissa Bauserman, Adrien Lokangaka, Justin Gado, Kelly Close, Dennis Wallace, Kule-Koto Kodondi, Antoinette Tshefu, Carl Bose

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Edible Insect Consumption for Human and Planetary Health: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Potential Use of Edible Insects in Complementary Foods for Children: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Palm Weevil Larvae (Journal of nutrition and metabolism · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Melissa Bauserman1Department of Pediatrics,Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine,School of Medicine,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,101 Manning Drive,CB#7596,Chapel Hill,NC 27599-7596,USA.
Adrien Lokangaka3Kinshasa School of Public Health,Kinshasa,Democratic Republic of Congo.
Justin Gado3Kinshasa School of Public Health,Kinshasa,Democratic Republic of Congo.
Kelly Close4RTI International,Research Triangle Park,NC,USA.
Dennis Wallace4RTI International,Research Triangle Park,NC,USA.
Kule-Koto Kodondi5Department of Pharmacy,University of Kinshasa,Kinshasa,Democratic Republic of Congo.
Antoinette Tshefu3Kinshasa School of Public Health,Kinshasa,Democratic Republic of Congo.
Carl Bose1Department of Pediatrics,Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine,School of Medicine,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,101 Manning Drive,CB#7596,Chapel Hill,NC 27599-7596,USA.
Ministry of Public Health · CDRTI International · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Kinshasa · CD

Funding

A Strategy to Reduce Stunting of Growth in Early Infancy: a Global Network StudyU10HD076465 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOSE, CARL · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a cereal made from caterpillars, a micronutrient-rich, locally available alternative animal-source food, on reducing stunting and anaemia in infants in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

designSix-month-old infants were cluster randomized to receive either caterpillar cereal daily until 18 months of age or the usual diet. At 18 months of age, anthropometric measurements and biological samples were collected.

settingThe rural Equateur Province in the Democratic Republic of Congo. SUBJECTS: One hundred and seventy-five infants followed from 6 to 18 months of age.

resultsStunting was common at 6 months (35%) and the prevalence increased until 18 months (69%). There was no difference in stunting prevalence at 18 months between the intervention and control groups (67% v. 71%, P = 0.69). Infants in the cereal group had higher Hb concentration than infants in the control group (10.7 v. 10.1 g/dl, P = 0.03) and fewer were anaemic (26 v. 50%, P = 0.006), although there was no difference in estimates of body Fe stores (6.7 v. 7.2 mg/kg body weight, P = 0.44).

conclusionsSupplementation of complementary foods with caterpillar cereal did not reduce the prevalence of stunting at 18 months of age. However, infants who consumed caterpillar cereal had higher Hb concentration and fewer were anaemic, suggesting that caterpillar cereal might have some beneficial effect. The high prevalence of stunting at 6 months and the lack of response to this micronutrient-rich supplement suggest that factors other than dietary deficiencies also contribute to stunting.

Indexed as

DietInfant FoodAnemiaAnimalsCongoDeficiency DiseasesDietary SupplementsFemaleGrowth DisordersHemoglobinsHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInsectaMaleMicronutrientsHemoglobinsMicronutrientsAnaemiaComplementary feedingStunting

Identifiers

PMID25631295
PMCPMC10271482
OpenAlexW2142165765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.