Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25631285›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2015

Cancer-related internet information communication between oncologists and patients with breast cancer: a qualitative study.

Megan Johnson Shen, Robert C Dyson, Thomas A D'Agostino, Jamie S Ostroff, Maura N Dickler, Alexandra S Heerdt, Carma L Bylund

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Talking with clinicians about online cancer information: a survey of cancer patients and surrogate information seekers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Megan Johnson ShenMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Robert C DysonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Thomas A D'AgostinoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Jamie S OstroffMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Maura N DicklerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Alexandra S HeerdtMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Carma L BylundMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Psychosocial Palliative & Community Research in CancerT32CA009461 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JENNIFER L HAY, Jamie S. Ostroff · 1985 to 2026
$10.1M
Doctor-Patient Communication about Cancer Related Internet Information and its EfR03CA130591 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BYLUND, CARMA L. · 2008 to 2009
$190k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R03 CA130591NCI NIH HHS R03-CA130591NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009461NCI NIH HHS T32-CA009461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMany patients with cancer search out information about their cancer on the internet, thus affecting their relationship with their oncologists. An in-depth analysis of patient-physician communication about information obtained from the internet is currently lacking.

methodsWe audio-recorded visits of patients with breast cancer and their oncologists where internet information was expected to be discussed. Inductive thematic text analysis was used to identify qualitative themes from these conversations.

resultsTwenty-one patients self-reported discussing cancer-related internet information (CRII) with their oncologists; 16 audio recordings contained detectable discussions of CRII and were analyzed. Results indicated that oncologists and patients initiated CRII discussions implicitly and explicitly. Oncologists responded positively to patient-initiated CRII discussions by (1) acknowledging their limited expertise/knowledge, (2) encouraging/approving using the internet as an information resource, (3) providing information/guidance on the proper use of internet searches, (4) discussing the pros and cons of relevant treatment options, or (5) giving information. Finally, patients reacted to the CRII discussions by (1) indicating that they only used reputable sources/websites, (2) asking for further explanation of information, (3) expressing continued concern, or (4) asking for the oncologist's opinion or recommendation.

conclusionsThese results indicate that the majority of patients introduce internet information implicitly, in order to guard against any threat to their self-esteem. Physicians, in turn, seem to respond in a supportive fashion to reduce any threat experienced. Future interventions may consider providing prescription-based guidance on how to navigate the internet as a health information resource and to encourage patients to bring these topics up with their oncologist.

Indexed as

CommunicationConsumer Health InformationInternetPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID25631285
PMCPMC4517971
OpenAlexW1600359489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.