Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25631114›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2015

One-year human experience with a novel endoluminal, endoscopic gastric bypass sleeve for morbid obesity.

Bryan J Sandler, Roberto Rumbaut, C Paul Swain, Gustavo Torres, Luis Morales, Lizcelly Gonzales, Sarah Schultz, Mark A Talamini, Garth R Jacobsen, Santiago Horgan

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Endoscopic small bowel therapies for type 2 diabetes.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Review
  3. Endoscopic bariatrics: Current status and emerging technologies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Endobariatric systems: Strategic integration of endoscopic therapies in the management of obesity.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  7. Update on Endoscopic Treatments for Obesity.Current obesity reports · 2024
    Review
  8. Endoscopic Bariatric Therapy for Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2023
    Review
  9. Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Endoscopic bariatrics: current therapies and future directions.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Bariatric and Metabolic Endoscopy: A New Paradigm.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies Targeting the Small Intestine.Techniques and innovations in gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2020
    Article
  18. Metabolic endoscopy: Today's science-tomorrow's treatment.United European gastroenterology journal · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bryan J SandlerDivision of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. bsandler@ucsd.edu.
Roberto RumbautHospital de Tec de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.
C Paul SwainImperial College of London, London, UK.
Gustavo TorresHospital de Tec de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.
Luis MoralesHospital de Tec de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.
Lizcelly GonzalesHospital de Tec de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.
Sarah SchultzDivision of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mark A TalaminiDepartment of Surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Garth R JacobsenDivision of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Santiago HorganDivision of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Tecnológico de Monterrey · MXUniversity of California, San Diego · USImperial College London · GBStony Brook Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHere, we report the first series of patients with 1-year implantation of a novel, endoluminal, endoscopically delivered and retrieved gastro-duodeno-jejunal bypass sleeve (GJBS) (ValenTx, Inc. Carpinteria, CA, USA). In this report, we present the safety, feasibility of the device, weight loss, and changes in comorbidities. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A prospective, single-center, 12-month trial was designed. The patients are morbidly obese individuals who meet the NIH criteria for bariatric surgery. The GJBS is a 120-cm sleeve secured at the esophago-gastric junction with endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques that is designed to create an endoluminal gastro-duodeno-jejunal bypass. The device was implanted and, at the completion of the trial, retrieved with an endoscopic technique. The primary endpoints were safety and incidence of adverse events. The secondary outcomes included the percentage of excess weight loss (EWL) and changes in comorbidities, specifically glucose control, use of antihyperglycemics, and changes in hemoglobin A1C levels.

resultsFrom July 2009 until October 2009, 13 patients were prospectively enrolled for the 1-year trial. The study included five men and eight women with a mean preoperative BMI of 42 kg/m(2). One patient was excluded, at the time of endoscopic evaluation, due to inflammation at the GE junction. Two additional patients required early explantation of the device, within the first 4 weeks, due to patient intolerance. Upon explant of the device, both patients' symptoms improved. In the remaining ten patients, the device was implanted, left in situ for 12 months, and then retrieved endoscopically. Safe delivery of the cuff at the gastro-esophageal junction was seen in all ten patients whom had device implants, without complication. No esophageal leak was seen immediately post-procedure or during follow-up. The sleeve device was well tolerated within the bowel lumen during the 12-month study, specifically, no bowel erosions, ulceration, or pancreatitis was observed. All ten patients reached the 1-year mark. Of the ten, six had fully attached and functional devices throughout the follow-up, verified by endoscopy. The mean percentage EWL, at 1 year, in this group was 54 %. In the remaining four patients, partial cuff detachment was observed at follow-up endoscopy. The percentage EWL was lower in this group. Of the six patients that reached a year with a fully attached device, five were followed at an average of 14-months post-explant (26 months from the time of device implant). These five maintained an average percentage EWL of 30 % at the 14-month post-explant follow-up. Co-morbidites measured included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and use of antihyperglycemics. Each of the measured comorbidities showed improvement during the 12-month trial. DISCUSSION: The endoluminal, GJBS can be safely placed and retrieved. The short-term data show it is well tolerated with a good safety profile. It achieves excellent weight loss results with over 70 % of all comorbidities resolved or significantly improved.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDevice RemovalEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastric BypassHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesProstheses and ImplantsBariatricClinical papers/trials/researchEndocrinologyG-I < endoscopySurgical < technical

Identifiers

PMID25631114
OpenAlexW2003637108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.