Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25631112›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015

Esophageal covered stent fixation using an endoscopic over-the-scope clip. Mechanical proof of the concept and first clinical experience.

Michele Diana, Lee L Swanström, Peter Halvax, Andras Lègner, Yu-Yin Liu, Amilcar Alzaga, Antonio D'Urso, Jacques Marescaux

Abstract readCase ReportsEvaluation StudyVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Helix tack suspension for esophageal stent fixation.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Endoscopic Management of Benign Esophageal Ruptures and Leaks.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Update on Enteral Stents.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michele DianaIRCAD, Research Institute Against Cancer of Digestive System, Strasbourg, France. michele.diana@ircad.fr.
Lee L SwanströmIHU-Strasbourg, University Institute for Minimally-Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Therapies, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France. lee.swanstrom@ihu-strasbourg.eu.
Peter HalvaxIHU-Strasbourg, University Institute for Minimally-Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Therapies, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
Andras LègnerIHU-Strasbourg, University Institute for Minimally-Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Therapies, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
Yu-Yin LiuIRCAD, Research Institute Against Cancer of Digestive System, Strasbourg, France.
Amilcar AlzagaIHU-Strasbourg, University Institute for Minimally-Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Therapies, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
Antonio D'UrsoDepartment of General, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jacques MarescauxIRCAD, Research Institute Against Cancer of Digestive System, Strasbourg, France.
Institut de Chirurgie Guidée par l'Image · FRInstitut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsEndoscopic suturing reduces stent migration, but is challenging and time-consuming. We compare endoscopic suturing versus anchoring with a novel over-the-scope clip (Padlock) to fix esophageal stents. Additionally, the first clinical case of Padlock stent fixation is reported. MATERIALS AND

methodsA fully covered esophageal stent was placed in 11 pigs and fixed with one figure-of-eight suture (n = 5) or with a Padlock (n = 4) or not fixed (controls; n = 2). The force required to mobilize the stent was recorded. CLINICAL CASE: an esophageal stent was fixed with a Padlock and endoscopically removed 1 month later, in an 82-year-old patient.

resultsMean force (newton) to mobilize the stent was similar after suturing and Padlock fixation (23.99 ± 14.91 vs. 19.97 ± 7.62; p = 0.32). In controls was 7 and 11 Newtons. Suturing time (seconds) was longer than Padlock application (455.4 ± 144.83 vs. 155 ± 12.9; p = 0.002). CLINICAL CASE: stent fixation was feasible and uncomplicated. Removal was easy, and only mild bleeding occurred.

conclusionsPadlock is faster than endoscopic suturing and achieves similar stent fixation. The first clinical case confirms the feasibility of the method.

Indexed as

StentsSuture TechniquesAged, 80 and overAnimalsEsophagoscopesEsophagoscopyEsophagusHumansSwineAponos clipClipsEndoscopic suturingFully covered self-expandable metal stentsOverstitchStent fixationStent, stent migration

Identifiers

PMID25631112
OpenAlexW2059226346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.