ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015
A percutaneous drainage protocol for severe and moderately severe acute pancreatitis.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pancreatic Duct Stenting During ERCP in Patients with Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Pooled it
- A meta-analysis and systematic review of percutaneous catheter drainage in treating infected pancreatitis necrosis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Mitigating Postoperative Fistula Risks in Laparoscopic Pancreatic Enucleation: A Retrospective Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Current trends in acute pancreatitis: Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Stenting of the pancreatic duct in the early phase of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Indian College of Radiology and Imaging Consensus Guidelines on Interventions in Pancreatitis.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2022Review
- Aggressive Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Protocol for Necrotic Pancreatic Collections.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020Article
- Kissing catheter technique for percutaneous catheter drainage of necrotic pancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Multidisciplinary Approach to Treating Severe Acute Pancreatitis in a Low-Volume Hospital.World journal of surgery · 2019Article
- Early complications after interventions in patients with acute pancreatitis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccording to the revised Atlanta classification, severe and moderately severe acute pancreatitis (AP) includes patients with pancreatic and peripancreatic collections with or without organ failure. These collections suggest the presence of pancreatic juice leakage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) protocol designed to control leakage and decrease disease severity.
methodsAmong 663 patients with clinical AP, 122 were classified as moderately severe or severe AP (all had collections). The computed tomography severity index (CTSI) score was calculated. The indication for PCD was based on progressive clinical signs and symptoms. Drain patency, position, and need for additional drainage sites were assessed using CT scans and drain studies initially every 3 days using a proactive protocol. Drain fluid was examined for amylase concentration and microbiological culture. Clinicopathological variables for patients with and without PCD were compared. Since there was no mortality, we used prolonged drainage time to measure the success of PCD. Within the group treated with PCD, variables that resulted in prolonged drainage time were analyzed.
resultsPCD was used in 47/122 (39 %) patients of which 33/47 (70 %) had necrosis. PCD cases had a median CTSI of 8 and were classified as moderately severe AP (57 %) and severe AP (43 %). Inhospital mortality was zero. Surgical necrosectomy was not required for patients with necrosis. Independent risk factors for prolonged drainage time were persistent organ failure >48 h (P = 0.001), CTSI 8-10 (P = 0.038), prolonged duration of amylase-rich fluid in drains (P < 0.001), and polymicrobial culture fluid in drains (P = 0.015).
conclusionsA proactive PCD protocol persistently maintaining drain patency advanced to the site of leak controlled the prolonged amylase in drainage fluid resulting in a mortality rate of zero.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25631111What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.