Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25630504›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2015

Preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation in the pharmaceutical industry: an IQ consortium survey examining the current landscape.

Edgar Schuck, Tonika Bohnert, Arijit Chakravarty, Valeriu Damian-Iordache, Christopher Gibson, Cheng-Pang Hsu, Tycho Heimbach, Anu Shilpa Krishnatry, Bianca M Liederer, Jing Lin and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A Tutorial on Pharmacodynamic Scripting Facility in Simcyp.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2016
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 19 institutions in 4 countries.

Edgar SchuckModeling and Simulation, Eisai Inc., 155 Tice Blvd, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, 07677, USA, Edgar_Schuck@eisai.com.
Tonika Bohnert
Arijit Chakravarty
Valeriu Damian-Iordache
Christopher Gibson
Cheng-Pang Hsu
Tycho Heimbach
Anu Shilpa Krishnatry
Bianca M Liederer
Jing Lin
Tristan Maurer
Jerome T Mettetal
Daniel R Mudra
Marjoleen Jma Nijsen
Joseph Raybon
Patricia Schroeder
Virna Schuck
Satyendra Suryawanshi
Yaming Su
Patrick Trapa
Alice Tsai
Majid Vakilynejad
Shining Wang
Harvey Wong
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USGenentechGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (United States) · USSanofi (United States) · USAbbVie (United States) · USAmgen (United States) · USAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBBiogen (United States) · USDeerfield (United States) · USEisai (Japan) · JPEli Lilly (United States) · USNovartis (China) · CNNovartis (United States) · USOno Pharmaceutical (United States) · USSunovion (United States) · USTakeda (United States) · USUnited States Military Academy · USVertex Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of modeling and simulation techniques is increasingly common in preclinical stages of the drug discovery and development process. A survey focusing on preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) analysis was conducted across pharmaceutical companies that are members of the International Consortium for Quality and Innovation in Pharmaceutical Development. Based on survey responses, ~68% of companies use preclinical PK/PD analysis in all therapeutic areas indicating its broad application. An important goal of preclinical PK/PD analysis in all pharmaceutical companies is for the selection/optimization of doses and/or dose regimens, including prediction of human efficacious doses. Oncology was the therapeutic area with the most PK/PD analysis support and where it showed the most impact. Consistent use of more complex systems pharmacology models and hybrid physiologically based pharmacokinetic models with PK/PD components was less common compared to traditional PK/PD models. Preclinical PK/PD analysis is increasingly being included in regulatory submissions with ~73% of companies including these data to some degree. Most companies (~86%) have seen impact of preclinical PK/PD analyses in drug development. Finally, ~59% of pharmaceutical companies have plans to expand their PK/PD modeling groups over the next 2 years indicating continued growth. The growth of preclinical PK/PD modeling groups in pharmaceutical industry is necessary to establish required resources and skills to further expand use of preclinical PK/PD modeling in a meaningful and impactful manner.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalData CollectionDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug IndustryHumans

Identifiers

PMID25630504
PMCPMC4365101
OpenAlexW2049175881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.