Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25630309›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2015

Comparison of tocilizumab and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis of 1603 patients managed in routine clinical practice.

Marina Backhaus, Jörg Kaufmann, Constanze Richter, Siegfried Wassenberg, Anne-Eve Roske, Peter Hellmann, Markus Gaubitz

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Plasma proteomic profile of inflammatory depressive symptoms.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Value ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Role ofPharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  13. Cycling of tumor necrosis factor inhibitorsTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2021
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marina BackhausMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany, backhaus@park-klinik.com.
Jörg Kaufmann
Constanze Richter
Siegfried Wassenberg
Anne-Eve Roske
Peter Hellmann
Markus Gaubitz
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFachklinik 360° · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie · DERoche Pharma AG (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tocilizumab (TCZ) and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are recommended for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with inadequate response (IR) to prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). This retrospective analysis assessed the efficacy of TCZ and TNFi, alone or in combination with DMARDs, in 1603 patients with IR to previous treatment with either DMARDs (DMARD-IR) and/or TNFi (TNFi-IR), initiating treatment with TCZ or a TNFi, managed in routine clinical practice. Patients were grouped according to treatment history and treatment initiated: DMARD-IR patients initiating treatment with TCZ + DMARD (DMARD-IR TCZ) or TNFi + DMARD (DMARD-IR TNFi), DMARD-IR and/or TNFi-IR patients initiating treatment with TCZ monotherapy (TCZ mono) or TNFi monotherapy (TNFi mono), and TNFi-IR patients initiating treatment with TCZ + DMARD (TNFi-IR TCZ) or TNFi + DMARD (TNFi-IR TNFi). Patients initiating treatment with TCZ generally had more severe disease and longer disease duration compared with the corresponding TNFi group. Significantly more patients achieved remission (DAS28 ESR <2.6) in the TCZ groups compared with corresponding TNFi groups (DMARD-IR, TCZ 44.0 % vs. TNFi 29.6 %; monotherapy, TCZ 37.2 % vs. TNFi 30.2 %; TNF-IR, TCZ 41.3 % vs. TNFi 19.2 %; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). More patients achieved moderate-good responses (EULAR criteria) in the TCZ treatment groups (79-85 %) compared with TNFi treatment groups (65-81 %). Patient-reported outcomes showed greater improvements in TCZ compared with TNFi groups. In patients with inadequate response to DMARDs and/or TNFi treated in routine clinical practice, TCZ in combination with DMARDs or as monotherapy resulted in significantly more patients achieving remission and more marked improvements in patient-reported outcomes compared with TNF inhibitors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentstocilizumabTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID25630309
PMCPMC4365186
OpenAlexW2001200727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.