ArticlePloS one2015
Naming a Lego world. The role of language in the acquisition of abstract concepts.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Action channel switching costs in the comprehension of concrete and abstract mandarin verbs.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Impact of pacifier use and parenting characteristics on toddlers' vocabulary development.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Is justice grounded? How expertise shapes conceptual representation of institutional concepts.Psychological research · 2022Article
- Words have a weight: language as a source of inner grounding and flexibility in abstract concepts.Psychological research · 2022Article
- Abstract concepts: external influences, internal constraints, and methodological issues.Psychological research · 2022Review
- Modelling concrete and abstract concepts using brain-constrained deep neural networks.Psychological research · 2022Article
- Embodying Language through Gestures: Residuals of Motor Memories Modulate Motor Cortex Excitability during Abstract Words Comprehension.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- From Affordances to Abstract Words: The Flexibility of Sensorimotor Grounding.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Differences and similarities in the conceptualization of COVID-19 and other diseases in the first Italian lockdown.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Contextual Acquisition of Concrete and Abstract Words: Behavioural and Electrophysiological Evidence.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Development of Abstract Word Knowledge.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- A Future of Words: Language and the Challenge of Abstract Concepts.Journal of cognition · 2020Article
- Sociality to Reach Objects and to Catch Meaning.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Abstract concepts, language and sociality: from acquisition to inner speech.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Review
- Article
- Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2017Review
- Learning and Using Abstract Words: Evidence from Clinical Populations.BioMed research international · 2017Article
- Pacifier Overuse and Conceptual Relations of Abstract and Emotional Concepts.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Grounding Abstractness: Abstract Concepts and the Activation of the Mouth.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Article
- Neural correlates of visualizations of concrete and abstract words in preschool children: a developmental embodied approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While embodied approaches of cognition have proved to be successful in explaining concrete concepts and words, they have more difficulties in accounting for abstract concepts and words, and several proposals have been put forward. This work aims to test the Words As Tools proposal, according to which both abstract and concrete concepts are grounded in perception, action and emotional systems, but linguistic information is more important for abstract than for concrete concept representation, due to the different ways they are acquired: while for the acquisition of the latter linguistic information might play a role, for the acquisition of the former it is instead crucial. We investigated the acquisition of concrete and abstract concepts and words, and verified its impact on conceptual representation. In Experiment 1, participants explored and categorized novel concrete and abstract entities, and were taught a novel label for each category. Later they performed a categorical recognition task and an image-word matching task to verify a) whether and how the introduction of language changed the previously formed categories, b) whether language had a major weight for abstract than for concrete words representation, and c) whether this difference had consequences on bodily responses. The results confirm that, even though both concrete and abstract concepts are grounded, language facilitates the acquisition of the latter and plays a major role in their representation, resulting in faster responses with the mouth, typically associated with language production. Experiment 2 was a rating test aiming to verify whether the findings of Experiment 1 were simply due to heterogeneity, i.e. to the fact that the members of abstract categories were more heterogeneous than those of concrete categories. The results confirmed the effectiveness of our operationalization, showing that abstract concepts are more associated with the mouth and concrete ones with the hand, independently from heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.