Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25629782›Full record

ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2015

Rodents and risk in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam: seroprevalence of selected zoonotic viruses in rodents and humans.

Nguyen Van Cuong, Juan Carrique-Mas, Hien Vo Be, Nguyen Ngoc An, Ngo Tri Tue, Nguyet Lam Anh, Pham Hong Anh, Nguyen The Phuc, Stephen Baker, Liina Voutilainen and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Orthohantavirus seoulense as a cause of acute, dengue-negative febrile illness in southern Vietnam.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Nguyen Van Cuong1 Oxford University Clinical Research Unit , Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam .
Juan Carrique-Mas
Hien Vo Be
Nguyen Ngoc An
Ngo Tri Tue
Nguyet Lam Anh
Pham Hong Anh
Nguyen The Phuc
Stephen Baker
Liina Voutilainen
Anne Jääskeläinen
Eili Huhtamo
Mira Utriainen
Tarja Sironen
Antti Vaheri
Heikki Henttonen
Olli Vapalahti
Yannick Chaval
Serge Morand
Juliet E Bryant
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNUniversity of Helsinki · FIForest Research Institute · INUniversité de Montpellier · FRDong Thap University · VNUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 089276Wellcome Trust 100087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Mekong Delta in southern Vietnam, rats are commonly traded in wet markets and sold live for food consumption. We investigated seroprevalence to selected groups of rodent-borne viruses among human populations with high levels of animal exposure and among co-located rodent populations. The indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT) was used to determine seropositivity to representative reference strains of hantaviruses (Dobrava virus [DOBV], Seoul virus [SEOV]), cowpox virus, arenaviruses (lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus [LCMV]), flaviviruses (tick-borne encephalitis virus [TBEV]), and rodent parechoviruses (Ljungan virus), using sera from 245 humans living in Dong Thap Province and 275 rodents representing the five common rodent species sold in wet markets and present in peridomestic and farm settings. Combined seropositivity to DOBV and SEOV among the rodents and humans was 6.9% (19/275) and 3.7% (9/245), respectively; 1.1% (3/275) and 4.5% (11/245) to cowpox virus; 5.4% (15/275) and 47.3% (116/245) for TBEV; and exposure to Ljungan virus was 18.8% (46/245) in humans, but 0% in rodents. Very little seroreactivity was observed to LCMV in either rodents (1/275, 0.4%) or humans (2/245, 0.8%). Molecular screening of rodent liver tissues using consensus primers for flaviviruses did not yield any amplicons, whereas molecular screening of rodent lung tissues for hantavirus yielded one hantavirus sequence (SEOV). In summary, these results indicate low to moderate levels of endemic hantavirus circulation, possible circulation of a flavivirus in rodent reservoirs, and the first available data on human exposures to parechoviruses in Vietnam. Although the current evidence suggests only limited exposure of humans to known rodent-borne diseases, further research is warranted to assess public health implications of the rodent trade.

Indexed as

Disease VectorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesAnimalsArenavirusCowpox virusFlavivirusHumansMeatOrthohantavirusParechovirusRodentiaVietnamZoonosesCowpox virus–ArenavirusFlavivirusHantavirusLjungan virusRodentsVietnam

Identifiers

PMID25629782
PMCPMC4676424
OpenAlexW2029363646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.