Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25629511›Full record

ReviewRNA biology2014

Convergent evolution of AUA decoding in bacteria and archaea.

Tsutomu Suzuki, Tomoyuki Numata

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Polyamine function in archaea and bacteria.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Rewriting the Genetic Code.Annual review of microbiology · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Discrepancy among the synonymous codons with respect to their selection as optimal codon in bacteria.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2016
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tsutomu Suzukia Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology; Graduate School of Engineering ; University of Tokyo ; Hongo , Bunkyo-ku , Tokyo , Japan.
Tomoyuki Numata

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deciphering AUA codons is a difficult task for organisms, because AUA and AUG specify isoleucine (Ile) and methionine (Met), separately. Each of the other purine-ending sense co-don sets (NNR) specifies a single amino acid in the universal genetic code. In bacteria and archaea, the cytidine derivatives, 2-lysylcytidine (L or lysidine) and 2-agmatinylcytidine (agm(2)C or agmatidine), respectively, are found at the first letter of the anticodon of tRNA(Ile) responsible for AUA codons. These modifications prevent base pairing with G of the third letter of AUG codon, and enable tRNA(Ile) to decipher AUA codon specifically. In addition, these modifications confer a charging ability of tRNA(Ile) with Ile. Despite their similar chemical structures, L and agm(2)C are synthesized by distinctive mechanisms and catalyzed by different classes of enzymes, implying that the analogous decoding systems for AUA codons were established by convergent evolution after the phylogenic split between bacteria and archaea-eukaryotes lineages following divergence from the last universal common ancestor (LUCA).

Indexed as

Genetic CodeAnticodonArchaeaBacteriaBiological EvolutionCodonCytidineIsoleucineLysineMethionineModels, MolecularPhylogenyProtein BiosynthesisPyrimidine NucleosidesRibosomesRNA, TransferagmatidineAnticodonCodonCytidineIsoleucinelysidineLysineMethioninePyrimidine NucleosidesRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID25629511
PMCPMC4615378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.