ArticlePloS one2015
PCR-activated cell sorting for cultivation-free enrichment and sequencing of rare microbes.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-Cell Microfluidics: A Primer for Microbiologists.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Review
- DEPICT-seq: Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Rare Cell Subsets Isolated via Nucleic Acid Cytometry.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Single-cell analysis and spatial resolution of the gut microbiome.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- Rapid parallel generation of a fluorescently barcoded drop library from a microtiter plate using the plate-interfacing parallel encapsulation (PIPE) chip.Lab on a chip · 2022Article
- Droplet-microfluidics-assisted sequencing of HIV proviruses and their integration sites in cells from people on antiretroviral therapy.Nature biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- Enrichment of gut microbiome strains for cultivation-free genome sequencing using droplet microfluidics.Cell reports methods · 2022Article
- Sequencing Ultrarare Targets with Compound Nucleic Acid Cytometry.Analytical chemistry · 2021Article
- Methods and platforms for analysis of nucleic acids from single-cell based on microfluidics.Microfluidics and nanofluidics · 2021Review
- Targeted Single-Cell RNA and DNA Sequencing With Fluorescence-Activated Droplet Merger.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Image-Based Single Cell Sorting Automation in Droplet Microfluidics.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Microfluidic single-cell analysis-Toward integration and total on-chip analysis.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Review
- Mapping Microbial Capacities for Bioremediation: Genes to Genomics.Indian journal of microbiology · 2020Review
- Recent Advances in Droplet-based Microfluidic Technologies for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.Micromachines · 2019Review
- Microfluidic-Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Systems in Microbiology.Micromachines · 2019Review
- Review
- Emerging Microtechnologies and Automated Systems for Rapid Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing.SLAS technology · 2017Article
- Finding a helix in a haystack: nucleic acid cytometry with droplet microfluidics.Lab on a chip · 2017Review
- Review: Microbial analysis in dielectrophoretic microfluidic systems.Analytica chimica acta · 2017Review
- Efficient extraction of oil from droplet microfluidic emulsions.Biomicrofluidics · 2017Article
- PCR-activated cell sorting as a general, cultivation-free method for high-throughput identification and enrichment of virus hosts.Journal of virological methods · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial systems often exhibit staggering diversity, making the study of rare, interesting species challenging. For example, metagenomic analyses of mixed-cell populations are often dominated by the sequences of the most abundant organisms, while those of rare microbes are detected only at low levels, if at all. To overcome this, selective cultivation or fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) can be used to enrich for the target species prior to sequence analysis; however, since most microbes cannot be grown in the lab, cultivation strategies often fail, while cell sorting requires techniques to uniquely label the cell type of interest, which is often not possible with uncultivable microbes. Here, we introduce a culture-independent strategy for sorting microbial cells based on genomic content, which we term PCR-activated cell sorting (PACS). This technology, which utilizes the power of droplet-based microfluidics, is similar to FACS in that it uses a fluorescent signal to uniquely identify and sort target species. However, PACS differs importantly from FACS in that the signal is generated by performing PCR assays on the cells in microfluidic droplets, allowing target cells to be identified with high specificity with suitable design of PCR primers and TaqMan probes. The PACS assay is general, requires minimal optimization and, unlike antibody methods, can be developed without access to microbial antigens. Compared to non-specific methods in which cells are sorted based on size, granularity, or the ability to take up dye, PACS enables genetic sequence-specific sorting and recovery of the cell genomes. In addition to sorting microbes, PACS can be applied to eukaryotic cells, viruses, and naked nucleic acids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.