Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25628985›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2015

Cell therapy attempted as a novel approach for chronic traumatic brain injury - a pilot study.

Alok Sharma, Hemangi Sane, Pooja Kulkarni, Jayanti Yadav, Nandini Gokulchandran, Hema Biju, Prerna Badhe

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alok SharmaDepartment of Medical Services and Clinical research, NeuroGen Brain & Spine Institute, Stem Asia Hospital and Research Centre, Sector - 40, Plot No. 19, Palm Beach Road, Seawood (W), New Mumbai, 400706 India.
Hemangi SaneDepartment Of Research & Development, NeuroGen Brain & Spine Institute, Stem Asia Hospital and Research Centre, Sector - 40, Plot No. 19, Palm Beach Road, Seawood (W), New Mumbai, 400706 India.
Pooja KulkarniDepartment Of Research & Development, NeuroGen Brain & Spine Institute, Stem Asia Hospital and Research Centre, Sector - 40, Plot No. 19, Palm Beach Road, Seawood (W), New Mumbai, 400706 India.
Jayanti YadavDepartment Of NeuroRehabilitation, NeuroGen Brain & Spine Institute, Stem Asia Hospital and Research Centre, Sector - 40, Plot No. 19, Palm Beach Road, Seawood (W), New Mumbai, 400706 India.
Nandini GokulchandranDepartment of Medical Services and Clinical research, NeuroGen Brain & Spine Institute, Stem Asia Hospital and Research Centre, Sector - 40, Plot No. 19, Palm Beach Road, Seawood (W), New Mumbai, 400706 India.
Hema BijuDepartment Of NeuroRehabilitation, NeuroGen Brain & Spine Institute, Stem Asia Hospital and Research Centre, Sector - 40, Plot No. 19, Palm Beach Road, Seawood (W), New Mumbai, 400706 India.
Prerna BadheDepartment of Medical Services and Clinical research, NeuroGen Brain & Spine Institute, Stem Asia Hospital and Research Centre, Sector - 40, Plot No. 19, Palm Beach Road, Seawood (W), New Mumbai, 400706 India.
Neurogen Brain & Spine Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury is an injury to the brain parenchyma resulting from external factors such as vehicular accidents, falls, or sports injuries. Its outcome involves primary insult followed by a cascade of secondary insult, resulting in diffuse axonal injury further causing white matter damage. Surgical intervention targets the primary damage, whereas only few treatment alternatives are available to treat the secondary damage. Cellular therapy could be one of the prospective therapeutic options, as it has the potential to arrest the degeneration and promote regeneration of new cells in the brain. We conducted a pilot study on 14 cases who were administered with autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells, intrathecally. The follow up was done at 1 week, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. The Functional Independence Measure scale, the SF-8 Health Survey Scoring and the disability rating scale were used as outcome measures. These scales showed a positive shift in scores at the end of 6 months. Improvements were observed in various symptoms, along with activities of daily living. Improvement in PET CT scan performed before and 6 months after the intervention in 3 patients corresponded to the clinical and functional improvements observed in these patients. The results of this study suggest that cell therapy may promote functional recovery leading to an improved quality of life in chronic TBI. Although the results are positive, the improvements after cell therapy are not optimal. Hence, additional multicenter, controlled studies are required to establish cell therapy as a standard therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

AutologousBone marrowCellular therapyIntrathecalMononuclear cellsPET CT scanTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID25628985
PMCPMC4303601
OpenAlexW2158807787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.