ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2014
Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 354 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
354 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- AI-Enabled Imaging for Pathogen Detection Under Stress Conditions: A Systematic Review.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Pooled it
- From Conventional Detection to Point-of-care Tests (POCT) Method for Pediatric Respiratory Infections Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence and risk factors of seafood-borneFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Identification and Detection of AflatoxigenicToxins · 2026Review
- Article
- Establishment of a blocking ELISA using a newly generated monoclonal antibody against Salmonella flagellin for detecting antibodies in infected chickens.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Advances in Detecting Viable/Dead Foodborne Microorganisms Using Diverse Functional Nucleic Acid-Based Molecular Recognition.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Exploring the Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated From Sucuk and Dairy Products.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Article
- Stable and High-Throughput Single-Cell Sorting of Food Bacteria Using Spatiotemporal Video-Enhanced Raman Tweezers.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in Foodborne Pathogen Detection: From Conventional Confirmation to Integrated and Intelligent Platforms.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Preliminary Validation of a Colorimetric Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (c-LAMP) Assay for Detection ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Meat-Borne Bacterial Pathogen Detection: Conventional, Molecular and Emerging AI-Based Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Establishment of a RapidBiosensors · 2026Article
- Advances of Digital Detection for Foodborne Pathogens.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Detection and identification of pathogens using agents targeting the bacterial cell wall.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Metal-Organic Framework-Based Nanozymes for Enhanced Biosensing Applications.Biosensors · 2026Review
- The contribution of vibrational spectroscopy and data analytics towards the achievement of the global sustainability goals.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Review
- Establishment and Validation of a Rapid ERA Detection Method forBiosensors · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance in the Food Chain: Bridging Knowledge Gaps for Effective Detection and Control.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
294 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of foodborne diseases has increased over the years and resulted in major public health problem globally. Foodborne pathogens can be found in various foods and it is important to detect foodborne pathogens to provide safe food supply and to prevent foodborne diseases. The conventional methods used to detect foodborne pathogen are time consuming and laborious. Hence, a variety of methods have been developed for rapid detection of foodborne pathogens as it is required in many food analyses. Rapid detection methods can be categorized into nucleic acid-based, biosensor-based and immunological-based methods. This review emphasizes on the principles and application of recent rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens. Detection methods included are simple polymerase chain reaction (PCR), multiplex PCR, real-time PCR, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and oligonucleotide DNA microarray which classified as nucleic acid-based methods; optical, electrochemical and mass-based biosensors which classified as biosensor-based methods; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and lateral flow immunoassay which classified as immunological-based methods. In general, rapid detection methods are generally time-efficient, sensitive, specific and labor-saving. The developments of rapid detection methods are vital in prevention and treatment of foodborne diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.