ReviewFrontiers in psychology2014
Revisiting vocal perception in non-human animals: a review of vowel discrimination, speaker voice recognition, and speaker normalization.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dogs tuned to conspecific vocalizations: behavioral evidence for a voice processing preference.Animal cognition · 2026Article
- Can an old rook learn new tricks? Vocal command comprehension and obedience in rooks (Corvus frugilegus).Animal cognition · 2025Article
- Do goats recognise humans cross-modally?PeerJ · 2025Article
- Article
- The Role of Talking Faces in Infant Language Learning: Mind the Gap between Screen-Based Settings and Real-Life Communicative Interactions.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- The acoustic bases of human voice identity processing in dogs.Animal cognition · 2022Article
- Cross-Dialectal Novel Word Learning and Borrowing.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Repetition enhancement to voice identities in the dog brain.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Dogs perceive and spontaneously normalize formant-related speaker and vowel differences in human speech sounds.Biology letters · 2019Article
- Mechanisms underlying speech sound discrimination and categorization in humans and zebra finches.Animal cognition · 2018Article
- Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017Article
- Selective auditory grouping by zebra finches: testing the iambic-trochaic law.Animal cognition · 2017Article
- Phonological perception by birds: budgerigars can perceive lexical stress.Animal cognition · 2016Article
- Emotional and Interactional Prosody across Animal Communication Systems: A Comparative Approach to the Emergence of Language.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Review
- Speaker and Accent Variation Are Handled Differently: Evidence in Native and Non-Native Listeners.PloS one · 2016Article
- Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns.Animal cognition · 2016Article
- A general auditory bias for handling speaker variability in speech? Evidence in humans and songbirds.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extent to which human speech perception evolved by taking advantage of predispositions and pre-existing features of vertebrate auditory and cognitive systems remains a central question in the evolution of speech. This paper reviews asymmetries in vowel perception, speaker voice recognition, and speaker normalization in non-human animals - topics that have not been thoroughly discussed in relation to the abilities of non-human animals, but are nonetheless important aspects of vocal perception. Throughout this paper we demonstrate that addressing these issues in non-human animals is relevant and worthwhile because many non-human animals must deal with similar issues in their natural environment. That is, they must also discriminate between similar-sounding vocalizations, determine signaler identity from vocalizations, and resolve signaler-dependent variation in vocalizations from conspecifics. Overall, we find that, although plausible, the current evidence is insufficiently strong to conclude that directional asymmetries in vowel perception are specific to humans, or that non-human animals can use voice characteristics to recognize human individuals. However, we do find some indication that non-human animals can normalize speaker differences. Accordingly, we identify avenues for future research that would greatly improve and advance our understanding of these topics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.