ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2015
Neonatal heart regeneration: mounting support and need for technical standards.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines for experimental models of myocardial ischemia and infarction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2018Guideline
- Proteomics Analysis of Extracellular Matrix Remodeling During Zebrafish Heart Regeneration.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019Article
- Immune responses in cardiac repair and regeneration: a comparative point of view.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019Review
- New Myocyte Formation in the Adult Heart: Endogenous Sources and Therapeutic Implications.Circulation research · 2018Review
- Wnt11 regulates cardiac chamber development and disease during perinatal maturation.JCI insight · 2017Article
- Cardiomyocyte renewal in the human heart: insights from the fall-out.European heart journal · 2017Review
- Ablation of periostin inhibits post-infarction myocardial regeneration in neonatal mice mediated by the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase/glycogen synthase kinase 3β/cyclin D1 signalling pathway.Cardiovascular research · 2017Article
- A reproducible protocol for neonatal ischemic injury and cardiac regeneration in neonatal mice.Basic research in cardiology · 2016Article
- Bmi1 (+) cardiac progenitor cells contribute to myocardial repair following acute injury.Stem cell research & therapy · 2016Article
- A cryoinjury model in neonatal mice for cardiac translational and regeneration research.Nature protocols · 2016Article
- Evolution, comparative biology and ontogeny of vertebrate heart regeneration.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2016Review
- Small mammalian animal models of heart disease.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.