Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25628330›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2015

The importance of soil drying and re-wetting in crop phytohormonal and nutritional responses to deficit irrigation.

Ian C Dodd, Jaime Puértolas, Katrin Huber, Juan Gabriel Pérez-Pérez, Hannah R Wright, Martin S A Blackwell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rhizosphere BacteriumBiomolecules · 2021
    Article
  11. Abscisic Acid Mediates Drought and Salt Stress Responses inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ian C DoddCentre for Sustainable Agriculture, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 1YQ, UK i.dodd@lancaster.ac.uk.
Jaime PuértolasCentre for Sustainable Agriculture, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 1YQ, UK.
Katrin HuberInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences: Agrosphere (IBG 3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.
Juan Gabriel Pérez-PérezDepartment of Citriculture, IMIDA, 30150 La Alberca, Murcia, Spain.
Hannah R WrightCentre for Sustainable Agriculture, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 1YQ, UK.
Martin S A BlackwellRothamsted Research-North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK.
Lancaster University · GBForschungszentrum Jülich · DEInstituto de Arqueología-Mérida · ESRothamsted Research · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J003336/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil drying and re-wetting (DRW) occurs at varying frequencies and intensities during crop production, and is deliberately used in water-saving irrigation techniques that aim to enhance crop water use efficiency. Soil drying not only limits root water uptake which can (but not always) perturb shoot water status, but also alters root synthesis of phytohormones and their transport to shoots to regulate leaf growth and gas exchange. Re-wetting the soil rapidly restores leaf water potential and leaf growth (minutes to hours), but gas exchange recovers more slowly (hours to days), probably mediated by sustained changes in root to shoot phytohormonal signalling. Partial rootzone drying (PRD) deliberately irrigates only part of the rootzone, while the remainder is allowed to dry. Alternating these wet and dry zones (thus re-wetting dry soil) substantially improves crop yields compared with maintaining fixed wet and dry zones or conventional deficit irrigation, and modifies phytohormonal (especially abscisic acid) signalling. Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) of rice can also improve yield compared with paddy culture, and is correlated with altered phytohormonal (including cytokinin) signalling. Both PRD and AWD can improve crop nutrition, and re-wetting dry soil provokes both physical and biological changes which affect soil nutrient availability. Whether this alters crop nutrient uptake depends on competition between plant and microbes for nutrients, with the rate of re-wetting determining microbial dynamics. Nevertheless, studies that examine the effects of soil DRW on both crop nutritional and phytohormonal responses are relatively rare; thus, determining the cause(s) of enhanced crop yields under AWD and PRD remains challenging.

Indexed as

Agricultural IrrigationDesiccationSoilNutritional Physiological PhenomenaPlant Growth RegulatorsSignal TransductionPlant Growth RegulatorsSoilABAalternate wetting and dryingpartial rootzone dryingroot-to-shoot signallingsoil phosphorus dynamicsxylem sap.

Identifiers

PMID25628330
PMCPMC4986717
OpenAlexW2044582507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.